Developing Aural and Oral Skills of Beginner Learners of English as a Foreign Language Through Explicit Metacognitive Strategies Training

Abstract

Learners of foreign languages from different levels of education need to be active agents of their learning process. They need to develop strategic competence to become proficient learners and users of the foreign language. One way to foster this active and strategic role is to instruct learners in the use of Metacognitive Strategies. This work of research studied the effect of Metacognitive Strategies training on students’ aural and oral skills. Forty-two seventh graders from a public institution participated in a six-workshop training cycle on strategies for planning, monitoring and evaluating learning tasks, following the model of the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach- CALLA (preparation, presentation, practice, evaluation and expansion). The findings showed that Metacognitive Strategies positively impacted students’ aural and oral skills, favored their vocabulary repertoire, produced a favorable change in their attitudes towards listening and speaking, and raised their feeling of success and self-efficacy. This implies that Metacognitive Strategies should be incorporated into the regular language class to help students become more self-regulated learners.

Keywords:

Aprendizaje auto-regulado

Conciencia Metacognitiva

Estrategias Metacognitivas

Habilidad auditiva

Habilidad oral

Instrucción efectiva

Aural skills

effective instruction

Metacognitive awareness

Metacognitive Strategies

self-directed learning

oral skills

References

Bozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Education, 2012, 6 pages.
https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/734085

Burns, A. (2001). Collaborative action research for english language teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Chamot, A. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: current issues and research. Annual review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S0267190505000061

Chamot, A.U., Barnhardt, S., El Dinary, P., Carbonaro, G. & Robbins, J., (1993). Methods for teaching Learning strategies in the foreign language classroom and Assessment of Language skills for instruction. Final report. Georgetown University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365157.pdf

Cohen, A. D. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies: clarifying the issues. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis. Revised version.

Coşkun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-ROYAL, 4(1), 35-50. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509339

Diaz, I. (2015). Training in metacognitive strategies for students’ vocabulary improvement by using learning journals. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 17(1), 87-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.41632

Guapacha Chamorro, M. E., & Benavidez Paz, L. H. (2017). Improving language learning strategies and performance of pre-service language teachers through a CALLATBLT model. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development,19(2), 101-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n2.57581

Ismael, H. A., (2015). The role of metacognitive knowledge in enhancing learners autonomy. International journal of language and linguistics, 2(4), 95-102

James, C. J. (1985). The testing of proficiency in listening comprehension: guiding for teaching. In a meeting the call for excellence in the foreign language classroom and selected papers from the Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.(9 pages)

Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. http://old.fltrp.com/download/07041802.pdf

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. (Third ed). Oxford.

Movahed, R. (2014). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on listening performance, metacognitive awareness and listening anxiety of beginner Iranian EFL
students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 88-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p88

Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

O’Malley, J. M., & Valdez-Pierce, L. V. (1996). Oral language assessment. In Authentic assessment for English language learners. Addison Wesley

O’Malley, J. M. & A. U. Chamot (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Rahimi, A. H., Birjandi, P. (2012). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening performance of EFL students. In International Journal of Linguistics,4(2),495-517. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1707

Rahimi, M., Katal, M. (2013). The impact of metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ listening comprehension and oral language proficiency.The Journal of Teaching
Language Skills, 5(2), 69-90. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=489532

Rahimirad, M. (2014).The impact of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening performance of university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 1485 – 1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.569

Rashtchi, M., & Khani, P. (2010). Improving EFL learners’ oral proficiency through metacognitive strategy instruction. JELS, 1(4),137-156

Richards, J. C. (2005). Second thoughts on teaching listening. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(1), 85-92.

Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. Penguin.

Trujillo, C. L., Álvarez, C. P., Zamudio, M. N. & Morales, G. (2015). Facilitating vocabulary learning through metacognitive strategy training and learning journals. Colombian applied linguistic journal,17(2),246-259.

Ur, P. (2013). A course in english language teaching. (First South Asian edition). Cambridge University Press.

Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: towards a model of the skilled L2 listener. Language Learning, 53, 461–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232

Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied linguistics,19(4), 515-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515