La interdisciplina como estrategia clave de puesta en valor dentro del museo. Diálogos entre la archivística, la museología, la curaduría y la conservación en el acervo documental (tipologías: audiovisuales-visuales-sonoros- textuales) y la colección del

Abstract

To address the interdisciplinary in the museal context I intend to reflect about the factors and actors participating in these institutional typologies.

It is part of the cultural collective imagination in the region, though with optimistic exceptions, to see the museum as a display space, this is to say, as an exhibition space, and in the best case scenario as containers that articulate in a more or less efficient way, com munication with the community. This display supposes as well the stagnation of the collections. Many times we find ourselves with institutions in which museal narrations are perpetuated and this, not only has an effect in the institutional communication, but also states other problems and works as adjectiving for the intra-museum behaviors.

As Gomez Alonso points out, the notion of museum suggests in itself a conceptual problem both from the semantic and the historical view point without sidelining the diversity of aesthetic appreciations emerging about this. The meaning which sketches such term can be understood as container or content, this is to say, either what the enclosure or building is and what is housed in it.

On the other hand, Santos Zunzunegui will see it as a space to signify. Then, from these perspectives we can resolve the gaps which locate the professional or suitable person as gear wheel in the space-symbolic system which the museum implies as a cultural institution. Resuming the display or exhibit concept this is many times reduced to the so called collections, to the work or to the objects which make part of the institution patrimony or to the external curatorial productions.Within the museal script the presence of other patrimonial properties existing in the heritage, such as the documental archives is less.

The relevance of these archives is many times highly meaningful for these narrations and them –more or less consciously- being made invisible, constitutes, in my opinion, a substantive lack in the cultural politics. In the case of this article, I intend to bring closer one of the experiences in which I have participated actively thorugh years of work in this type of institutions.

Keywords:

Interdisciplina

archivo

lenguajes

patrimonio

Interdisciplinary

archive

languages

patrimony

References

Aumont, Jacques. (1992). La imagen. Barcelona: Paidós.

Edmondson, Ray. (1998). Una filosofía de los archivos audiovisuales. Programa General de Información de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. París: UNESCO.

Del Valle Gastaminza, Félix. (2001). Análisis documental de la fotografía. Madrid,España.

Duranti, Luciana. (1997). Diplomática. Usos nuevos para una antigua ciencia. Sevilla: S & C.

Freund, Giselle. (1974). La fotografía como documento social. Colección Fotografía. Ediciones Gamma.

La Feria, Jorge. (1996). Un recorrido histórico y conceptual. Madre televisión. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.

Lodolini, Elbio. (1993). Archivística. Principios y problemas. Madrid: ANABAD. Sartori, Giovanni. (1998). Hommo Videns. La sociedad teledirigida. España: Ed. Taurus.

Lotman, Yuri. (1979). Estética y semiótica del cine. Del capítulo: La ilusión de la realidad. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, Colección Punto y Línea.
Saccomanno, José María. (2005). Aprender a ver o las tribulaciones de Argos Publicación Pfortner Views. N2. Creative Latin Media.

Zunzunegui, Santos. (1989). Pensar la imagen. Capítulo XXI: La imagen electrónica: el discurso televisual. Madrid: Cátedra.