Authors
Abstract
The objective of this work was to design and test an all-terrain wheelchair for the rural population, implementing an AZ31 magnesium alloy and a lever propulsion mechanism to reduce the effort made during mobility. Two wheelchair prototypes were evaluated under the ISO7176 standard and usability testing. To validate the fact that the wheelchair weight reduction represents a benefit, a repeated measures study was carried out to establish the effect of the material change on mobility efficiency. The tests were carried out in an academic campus in Colombia in an open space with a surface covered with grass, unevenness, and other obstacles to emulate the conditions of a rural environment. A convenience sample was used, randomly selecting 17 subjects from the academic community without disabilities or overweight. Two prototypes were manufactured, one in aluminum and the second in magnesium alloy. For the study of repeated measurements, each participant had to complete three tests with both prototypes: a short-dis ance test, an obstacles test, and a long-distance test, which were performed randomly. The magnesium alloy prototype achieved a 25% weight reduction. In ISO7176 testing, both prototypes maintained their structural integrity and functionality. Also, with a confidence of 95%, it was possible to establish that with the magnesium prototype, the users traveled a greater distance in the same time. The new design meets the needs of mobility, support, and comfort of users, making efficient use of magnesium alloy. Weight reduction in the wheelchair allows the user to save time on mobility or cover greater distances with less physical effort. This is a starting point to offer a contextualized and affordable product to the Latin American population.
Keywords:
References
Chacon-Cifuentes, P., Zuleta, A. A., Sevilla, G., Valencia-Escobar, A., Correa-Bedoya, E., & Echeverria-Echeverria, F. (2020a). Human factors in all-terrain wheelchair design for rural population. In Advances in Usability and User Experience: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conferences on Usability & User Experience, and Human Factors and Assistive Technology, 2019, 899-910.
Chacon-Cifuentes, P., Zuleta-Gil, A., Cadavid, G. S., Valencia-Escobar, A., Correa-Bedoya, E., & Echeverria-Echeverria, F. (2020b). Interdisciplinary Approach of the Design Process for the Application of New Materials in Wheelchair Design. In Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design, 2019, 75-82.
Flemmer, C. L., & Flemmer, R. C. (2016). A review of manual wheelchairs. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1099747
Gagnon, D. H., Roy, A., Verrier, M. C., Duclos, C., Craven, B. C., & Nadeau, S. (2016). Do Performance-Based Wheelchair Propulsion Tests Detect Changes among Manual Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury during Inpatient Rehabilitation in Quebec? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(7), 1214–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.018
Good Life Medical. (2018). Quickie GT. Retrieved on:(2021) and From: https://www.goodlifemedical.com.au/products/manual-wheelchairs/quickie-gt/
GRIT Freedom Chair. (n.d.). GRIT Freedom Chair - All Terrain Wheelchair. Retrieved on: (2019) and From: https://www.gogrit.us/
ICONTEC Internacional. (2009). NTC 4143 Accessibility To Physical Environment. Buildings and Urban Spaces Fixed Ramps Adequate and Basic (Issue 571).
International Organization for Standardization. (2014). International Standard ISO 7176-1 (Vol. 2014). ISO. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2007.4288250
International Organization for Standardization. (2015). International Standard ISO 7176-8 (Vol. 2015). ISO.
Invacare. (2018). Invacare Top End Crossfire All Terrain. Retrieved on: (2020) and From: http://www.topendwheelchair.com/product/crossfire-all-terrain-wheelchair
Lasher Sport. (2017). Lasher Sport_ BT-Mg. Retrieved on: (2019) and From: http://www.lashersport.com/pages/chairs/btmg/btmg.html
Liu, H., Cooper, R. A., Pearlman, J., & Connor, S. (2008). Evaluation of titanium ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI / RESNA standards. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 45(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.12.0204
Marszałek, J., Kosmol, A., Mróz, A., Wiszomirska, I., Fiok, K., & Molik, B. (2018). Physiological parameters depending on two different types of manual wheelchair propulsion. Assistive Technology, 00(00), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1529005
Medola, F. O., Elui, V. M. C., Santana, C. D. S., & Fortulan, C. A. (2014). Aspects of Manual Wheelchair Configuration Affecting Mobility: A Review. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 26, 313–318.
Motivation. (2015). Motivation Rough Terrain. Retrieved on:(2020) and From: https://www.motivation.org.uk/rough-terrain
Mountain Tirke. (2018). Mountain trike. Retrieved on:(2019) From: http://www.mountaintrike.com/products/mountain-trike
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2008). Pautas para el suministro de sillas de ruedas manuales en entornos de menores recursos. Pautas Para El Suministro de Sillas de Ruedas Manuales,137.
Pan, F., Yang, M., & Chen, X. (2016). A Review on Casting Magnesium Alloys: Modification of Commercial Alloys and Development of New Alloys. In Journal of Materials Science and Technology (Vol. 32, Issue 12, pp. 1211–1221). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.07.001
Rana, B. S., & Pun, M. (2015). Estimation of Physiological Cost Index as an Energy Expenditure Index using MacGregor’s Equation. JNMA; Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 53(199), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.2786
RGK. (2017). RGK Tiga TX I Made to Measure All Terrain Wheelchair. Retrieved on: (2019) and From: https://www.rgklife.com/wheelchairs/daily-wheelchairs/all-terrain-wheelchair.html
Rispin, K., & Wee, J. (2015). Comparison between performances of three types of manual wheelchairs often distributed in low-resource settings. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(4), 316–322.
Sasaki, K., & Rispin, K. (2017). Assessment of physiological performance and perception of pushing different wheelchairs on indoor modular units simulating a surface roughness often encountered in under-resourced settings. Assistive Technology, 29(4), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1216473
Singh, S. K., Arya, K. N., & Nagar, R. (2008). To compare the physiological effects of standard and light weight wheelchair design during propulsion by persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). The Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39(3), 73–78.
Stanfill, C. J., & Jensen, J. L. (2017). Effect of wheelchair design on wheeled mobility and propulsion efficiency in less-resourced settings. African Journal of Disability, 6(0), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v6i0.342
The Jamovi Project. (2021). jamovi (Version 1.6).
Trekinetic. (2018). Trekinetic K-2. Retrieved on:(2020) and From: http://www.trekinetic.com/K2.php
Unicare Health. (2018). Bushranger. Retrieved on:(2019) and From: https://www.unicarehealth.com.au/shop/5060-wheelchair-bushranger-manual
Whirlwind. (2018). Whirlwind Rough Ride. Retrieved on:(2020) and From: https://whirlwindwheelchair.org/product/roughrider
You, S., Huang, Y., Kainer, K. U., & Hort, N. (2017). Recent research and developments on wrought magnesium alloys. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 5, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2017.09.001
Zuleta, A. A., Correa, E., Castaño, J. G., Echeverría, F., Baron-Wiecheć, A., Skeldon, P., & Thompson, G. E. (2017). Study of the formation of alkaline electroless Ni-P coating on magnesium and AZ31B magnesium alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology, 321, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.04.059