Authors
Abstract
The aim of this essay is to reflect on the anthropology of the late David Graeber. Starting from putting into question the separation between his academic works —of great anthropological and ethnographic scholarship—and his political works —made in an incisive language but accessible to all audiences—, I select three topics or sources of the Graeberian reflection that demonstrate how futile such division is. In what follows, I examine successively the problems of social creativity, imagination, and political pleasure. Graeber devoted a good part of his personal, professional, and political energies to produce innovative answers to those three themes. In addition to inserting these conceptual discussions in a critical and systematic analytical reading of his work, I identify certain limited or specific conceptual discussions that stem from them but also account for their interrelationships. In the conclusions I propose that Graeber built his own transcendence against the subtle and discrete hierarchies of academia and the politics of knowledge, wounding their sectarian dogmatisms in an original, irreverent, and playful way.
Keywords:
References
Mauss, M. (1979 [1924]). Sociología y antropología. Tecnos.
Mead, M. (1993 [1939]). Adolescencia, sexo y cultura en Samoa. Planeta Agostini.
Pietz, W. (1993). Fetishism and Materialism: The Limits of Theory in Marx. En E. Apter y Pietz,
W. (eds.), Fetishism as Cultural Discourse. Cornell University Press.
Polanyi, K. (1976). El sistema económico como proceso institucionalizado. En Godelier (ed.),
Antropología y Economía (pp. 155-178). Anagrama.
Rancière J. (2006). El odio a la democracia (I. Agoff, Trad.). Ed. Amorrortu.
Stocking, G. Jr. (1982). A Franz Boas Reader: The Shaping of American Anthropology, 1883-1911.
University of Chicago Press.
Taussig, M. (1996 [1992]). Un gigante en convulsiones. El mundo humano como sistema nervioso
en emergencia permanente. Gedisa.
Turner, T. S. (1979). Anthropology and the politics of Indigenous peoples’ struggles. Cambridge
Anthropology, 5, 1-43.
Turner, T. S. (2003). The beautiful and the common: Gender and social hierarchy among
the Kayapo. Tipiti: The Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South
America, 1(1), 11-26.
Turner, T. S. (2008). Marxian value theory: An anthropological perspective. Anthropological
Theory, 8(1), 43-56.
Wagner, R. (1981 [1975]). The invention of culture. University of Chicago Press.
Weiner, A. (1992). Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. University
of California Press.