Evaluation of electrical impedance spectroscopy for cervical intraepithelial lesions detection

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in detection of pre-invasive cervical lesions. Design: Cross-sectional study of diagnostic validity carried out with 265 women between 15 and 55 years with abnormal pap smear report, referred to colposcopy, who were evaluated between January 2008 and June 2010 in the Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Network in the Departments of Caldas and Risaralda (Colombia). Measurements of electrical impedance spectroscopy of the cervix were made, new pap smear samples were taken, colposcopic examination and colposcopically directed biopsies were performed. Results: The evaluated parameters were resistivity of the extracellular space (R), resistivity of the intracellular space (S), cell membrane capacitance (Cm) and characteristic frequency (Fc). The results obtained for R parameter were: in squamous normal tissue 21.27 +/- 16.48 (Ωm); in high-grade lesions 4.28 +/- 2.28 (Ω-m); and in low-grade lesions 10.1 +/- 4.59 (Ω-m), showing a decrease of R in neoplastic tissue compared to normal tissue. The sensitivity of the EIS was 0.88 for high grade lesions and 0.71 for low grade lesions. The area under the ROC curves for high grade lesions /normal epithelium was 0.96, for low grade lesions/ normal epithelium was 0.76 and for high grade/low grade was 0.90. Conclusions: This study established that EIS is a useful technique for detection and characterization of cervical intraepithelial lesions, with diagnostic precision greater than 75%, with sensitivity and specificity over 69%, with an acceptable positive predictive value and a negative predictive value close to 90%.

Keywords:

impedancia eléctrica

lesiones intraepiteliales

cáncer cervical

electrical impedance

intraepithelial lesion

cervical cancer

References

1. Program for Appropiate Technology in Health PATH. Planning appropriate cervical cancer prevention programs. 2nd Ed.; 2000.

2. Vizcaíno AP, Moreno V, Bosh FX, Muñoz N, Barros-Dios XM, Borras J, et al. International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: II. Squamous-cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2000; 86:429-435.

3. Acog Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–gynecologists. 2008; 112(6).

4. Nanda K, McCrory D, Myers E, Bastian L, Hasselblad V, Hickey J, et al. Accuracy of the papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132(10):810-9.

5. Arrossi S, Sankaranarayanan R, Parkin DM. Incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Latin America. Salud Pública Mex 2003; 45(Suppl 3):5306-5314.

6. Piñeros M, Ferlay J, Murillo R. Cancer incidence estimates at the national and district levels in Colombia. Salud Pública Mex 2006; 48(6):455-465.

7. Wiesner-Ceballos C, Murillo- Moreno RH, Piñeros-Petersen M, Tovar-Murillo SL, Cendales-Duarte R, Gutiérrez MC. Control del cáncer cervicouterino en Colombia: la perspectiva de los actores del sistema de salud. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2009; 25(1):1-8.

8. Cronje H.S. Screening for cervical cancer in the developing World. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19:517-529.

9. Lazcano-Ponce E, Alonso P, Ruiz-Moreno JA, Hernández-Ávila M. Recommendations for cervical cancer screening programs in developing countries. The need for equity and technological development. Salud Pública Mex 2003; 45(Suppl 3):S449-S462

10. Lazcano-Ponce E, Alonso P, Hernández-Ávila M. Nuevas alternativas de prevención secundaria del cáncer cervical. Salud Pública Mex 2007; 49:E32-E34.

11. Sankaranarayanan R, Madhukar A, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Org 2001; 79:954-962.

12. Stein S. Thinprep versus the conventional papanicolaou test: a review of specimen adequacy, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 2003; 10(6):310-313.

13. Goel A, Gandhi G, Batra S, Bhambhani S, Zutshi V, Sachdeva P. Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid for cervical intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88:25-
30.

14. De Vuyst H, Claeys P, Njiru S, Muchiri S, Steyaert S, De Sutter P, et al. Comparison of pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, human papillomavirus DNA-PCR testing and cervicography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89:120-126.

15. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw K, et al. Early detection of cervical cancer with visual inspection methods: a summary of completed and ongoing studies in India. Salud Pública Mex 2003; 45(Suppl 3):S399-S407.

16. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Thara S, Dhakad N, Chandralekha B, Sebastian P, et al. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol’s iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India. Int J Cancer 2003; 106(3):404-408.

17. Basu PS, Sankaranarayanan R, Mandal R, Roy C, Das P, Choudhury D, et al. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology in the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13(5):626-632.

18. University of Zimbawe/JHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project. Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening test qualities in a primary-care setting. The Lancet 1999; 353:869-873.

19. Brown BH, Tidy JA, Boston K, Blackett AD, Smallwood RH, Sharp F. Relation between tissue structure and imposed electrical current flow in cervical neoplasia. The Lancet 2000; 355:892-895.

20. Abdul S, Brown B, Milnes P, Tidy J. A clinical study of the use of impedance spectroscopy in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99(3 Suppl 1):S64-S66.

21. Abdul S, Brown BH, Milnes P, Tidy JA. A clinical study of the use of impedance spectroscopy in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16:1823-1832.

22. Balasubramani L, Brown B, Healey J, Tidy JA. The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by electrical impedance spectroscopy: The effects of acetic acid and tissue homogeneity. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115:267-271.

23. Olarte G, Aristizábal W, Gallego PA, Rojas J, Botero BE, Osorio GF. Detección precoz de lesiones intraepiteliales del cuello uterino en mujeres de Caldas-Colombia mediante la técnica de espectroscopia de impedancia eléctrica. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2007; 58(1):13-20.

24. Olarte G, Aristizábal W, Osorio GF, Rojas J. Espectroscopía de impedancia eléctrica en cáncer invasivo del cuello uterino en mujeres de Caldas (Colombia), 2008-2009. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2010; 61(1):28-33.

25. Ramanujam N, Mitchell MF, Mahadevan A, Thomsen SL, Staerkel G, Malpica A, et al. Cervical precancer detection using a multivariate statistical, algorithm based on laser induced fluorescence at multiple excitation wavelengths. Photochem Photobiol 1996; 64(4):720-735.

26. Ramanujam N, Mitchell MF, Mahadevan A, Thomsen SL, Warren S, Silva E, et al. In vivo diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using 337 nm- excited laser induced fluorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994; 91:10193-10197.

27. Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RTCOG) and the JHPIEGO Corporation Cervical Cancer Prevention Group. Safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a single-visit approach to cervicalcancer prevention in rural Thailand: a demonstration project. Lancet 2003; 361:814-820.

28. Coppleson M, Reid Bl, Skladnev VN, Dalrymple JC. An electronic approach to the detection of precancer and cancer of the uterine cervix: a preliminary evaluation of Polarprobe. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 1994; 4:79-83.

29. Walker DC, Brown BH, Blackett AD, Tidy J, Smallwood RH. A study of the morphological parameters of cervical squamous epithelium. Physio Meas 2003; 24:121-35.