pdf (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
How to Cite
Medina-Rojas, I. D. ., & Barón-Martínez, L. C. . (2020). Economy and organizations, an approach from the perspective of sustainability and entropy. Luna Azul, (51), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2020.51.3
More Citation Formats
Authors
Iván Darío Medina-Rojas
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios
Lina Camila Barón-Martínez
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de DiosAbstract
This paper carries out an exercise of connection of social components such as economy and organizations with elements of the natural sciences such as ecology and the environment, through the use of interdisciplinarity when applying tools that seek their interrelationship such as entropy or general systems theory. The information obtained derives from the literature review, being these secondary sources specialized in the proposed themes from a holistic perspective. The objective of this work is to establish the appropriate connection of the fields of interest in a framework where there is great concern nowadays, as a result of a wealth of observations and experiences recorded by humanity, reason why the concept of sustainable development is present and strengthened at the current level. With this, it is possible to concatenate and understand that organizations (key units of economic development) and human beings have a role within the system, that they are part of the biotic and abiotic environment, that they maintain energy flows with accumulated impacts to the environment and. for this reason, the knowledge and development of improvement mechanisms turns out to be imperative in the present.
Keywords:
References
Aboelmaged, M. (2018). The drivers of sustainable manufacturing practices in Egyptian SMES and their impact on competitive capabilities: A PLS-SEM model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 207-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.053
Agbinya, J. I. (2020). Markov Chain and its Applications. In J. I. Agbinya, Applied Data Analytics: Principles and Applications (p. 300). River Publishers.
Arboleda-Naranjo, R. (2017). Estructuras disipativas en la comunicación y el comportamiento organizacional. Razón y Palabra, 21(2), 498-521. Link Bermejo, R. (2011). Manual para una economía sostenible. Catarata.
Berthet, E. T., Segrestin, B. y Hickey, G. M. (2016). Considering agro-ecosystems as ecological funds for collective design: New perspectives for environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.005
Bohórquez, L. E. (2013). La organización empresarial como sistema adaptativo complejo. Estudios Gerenciales, 29(127), 258-265. Link
Camarena, J. L. (2016). La organización como sistema: el modelo organizacional contemporáneo. Oikos Polis, Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, 1(1), 135-174. Link
Candas, S., Siala, K. y Hamacher, T. (2019). Sociodynamic modeling of small-scale PV adoption and insights on future expansion without feed-in tariffs. Energy Policy, 125, 521-536. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.029
Castaldo, M. (2012). Economy of degrowth and localization: theories and perspectives. Università Ca' Foscari Venezia. Link
Cavalcanti, C. (2010). Conceptions of Ecological Economics: its Relationship with Mainstream and Environmental Economics. Estudos Avançados, 53-67.
Ceptureanu, E. G., Ceptureanu, S. I. y Popescu, D. I. (2017). Relationship between Entropy, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Organizational Capabilities in Romanian Medium Sized Enterprises. Entropy, 2-17. doi: 10.3390/e19080412
Charonis, G. K. (2012). Degrowth, steady state economics and the circular economy: three distinct yet increasingly converging alternative discourses to economic growth for achieving environmental sustainability and social equity. Sustainability - Missing points in the development dialogue (pp. 1-18). Bristol.
Chong, J. L. y Olesen, K. (2017). A Technology-Organization-Environment Perspective on Ecoeffectiveness: A Meta-analysis. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1-26. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1441
Cojanu, V. (2009). Georgescu-Roegen’s entropic model: a methodological appraisal. Emerald publishing, 36(3), 274-286. doi: 10.1108/03068290910932756
Cornejo, A. (2004). Capítulo 2: Complejidad Organizacional. In A. Cornejo, Complejidad y caos. Guía para la administración del siglo XXI.
D'Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., ... Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716-734. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V. y Schouten, G. (2018). Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi‐stakeholder Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 333-356. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6
Epanchin-Niell, R. S. (2017). Economics of invasive species policy and management. Biol Invasions, 3333-3354. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1406-4
Farrell, K. N. y Mayumi, K. (2009). Time horizons and electricity futures: An application of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s general theory of economic production. Energy, 34(3), 301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.002
Fernhaber, S. A. y Stark, A. Y. (2019). Biomimicry: New insights for entrepreneurship scholarship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00137
Fistola, R., Gargiulo, C. y La Roca, C. A. (2020). Rethinking vulnerability in city-systems: A methodological proposal to assess “urban entropy”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 85. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106464
Foley, D. K. (2015). Dilemmas of Economic Growth. Eastern Economic Journal, 283-295.
Fontini, F. (2009). Probability and uncertainty: The legacy of georgescu-roegen. Metroeconomica, 60(2), 324-342.
Foster, J. (2011). Capitalism and Degrowth—An Impossibility Theorem. Monthly review, 26-33. doi: 10.14452/MR-062-08-2011-01_2
Franco, M. (2018). Searching for a Scientific Paradigm in Ecological Economics: The History of Ecological Economic Thought, 1880s–1930s. Ecological Economics, 153, 195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.022
Ganesh, S. S. y Joseph, J. (2011). Exploring perceived organisational formalisation and performance review system complexity as predictors of executive alienation in performance review systems. IIMB Management Review, 23(4), 197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2011.07.001
Gheorghică, A. E. (2012). The Emergence of la Decroissance. Ces Working Papers, 47, 60-72. Link
Giampietro, M. (2019). On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001
Giannakis, M., Dubey, R., Vlachos, I. y Ju, Y. (2020). Supplier sustainability performance evaluation using the analytic network process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119439
Goklany, I. M. (2002). The Globalization of Human Well-Being. Policy Analysis, (447), 1-20. Link
Gowdy, J. (2005). The death of homo economicus: is there life after welfare economics? Emerald Publishing, 32(11), 924-938. doi: 10.1108/03068290510623771
Haapanen, L. y Tapio, P. (2016). Economic growth as phenomenon, institution and ideology: a qualitative content analysis of the 21st century growth critique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3492-3503. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.024
Harribey, J. M. (2007). Les théories de la décroissance : enjeux et limites. Cahiers français, «Développement et environnement», (337), 20-26.
Hasenheit, M., Gerdes, H., Kiresiewa, Z. y Beekman, V. (2016). Summary report on the social, economic and environmental impacts of the bioeconomy. Biostep, 2-29.
Heinzel, C. (2013). Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 251-271. doi: 10.1093/cje/bes060
Henry, G., Pahun, J. y Trigo, E. (2014). La Bioeconomía en América Latina: oportunidades de desarrollo e implicaciones de política e investigación. FACES, 125-141. http://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/2112/
Hestad, D., Tàbara, J. D. y Thornton, T. F. (2020). The three logics of sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations: a multi-disciplinary review. Sustainability Science. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00883-x
Iorgulescu, R. I., Polimeni, J. M. y Balan, M. (2015). Bioeconomic sustainability and modelling energy systems. Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 9(1), 46-59. doi:10.1504/PIE.2015.069840
Karakaya, E. y Nuur, E. K. (2018). Social sciences and the mining sector: Some insights into recent research trends. Resources Policy, 58, 257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.014
Kay, J. (2019). The concept of the corporation. Business History, 61(7), 1129-1143. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1509956
Kerschner, C. (2010). Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019
Kraśnicka, T., Głód, W. y Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2018). Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 737-769. doi: 10.1007/s11846-017-0229-0
Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S. y Brändle, L. (2020). Entrepreneurship and the sustainable bioeconomy transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.003
Larsen, J. K., Lindhard, S. M., Brunoe, T. D. y Jensen, K. N. (2018). The Relation between Pre-planning, Commissioning and Enhanced Project Performance. Construction Economics and Building, 18(2), 1-14. doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v18i2.5762
Leff, H. S. (2021). Energy and Entropy. A Dynamic Duo. CRC Press.
Lenfant, J. S. (2018). Probabilising the consumer: Georgescu-Roegen, Marschak and Quandt on the modelling of the consumer in the 1950s. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(1), 36-72. doi: 10.1080/09672567.2017.1415949
Levallois, C. (2010). Can de-growth be considered a policy option? A historical note on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and the Club of Rome. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2271-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.020
Lomas, P. L. y Giampietro, M. (2017). Environmental accounting for ecosystem conservation: Linking societal and ecosystem metabolisms. Ecological Modelling, 346, 10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.12.009
López, M. E., Arias, L. y Rave, S. N. (2006). Las organizaciones y la evolución administrativa. Scientia Et Technica, 2(31), 147-152. doi: 10.22517/23447214.6409
Lukinaitė, E. y Sondaitė, J. (2017). Mindset of employees working in a matrix organizational structure. Business. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 144-151. doi: 10.3846/btp.2017.015
Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U. y Vivien, F. -D. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 1741-1747.doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017
Melnik, S. S. y Usatenko, O. V. (2018). Entropy of high-order Markov chains beyond the pair correlations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 506, 208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.025
Mohammadian, M. (2004). La Bioeconomía: Un nuevo paradigma socioeconómico para el siglo XXl. Dialnet, 57-70.
Morgan, G. (1998). Imágenes de la Organización. Alfaomega.
Norberg, J. (2016). Progress: Ten reasons to look forward to the future. Oneworld Publications.
Pauliuk, S. y Hertwich, E. G. (2015). Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies. Ecological Economics, 119, 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.012
Pinker, S. (2018). En defensa de la ilustración. Por la razón, la ciencia, el humanismo y el progreso. Paidós.
Pulgarín, S. A. (2013). De las Organizaciones: Reflexiones y aproximaciones desde la biología y la complejidad. Criterio Libre, 11(18), 195-216. doi: 10.18041/1900- 0642/criteriolibre.2013v11n18.1131
Rivas, L. (2006). Implicaciones de la teoría de la complejidad en la organización, los procesos, los empleados y los modelos de dirección estratégica. I.I.E.S.C.A., 130-144. Link
Rodela, R., Tucker, C. M., Šmid-Hribar, M., Sigura, M., Bogataj, N., Urbanc, M. y Gunya, A. (2019). Intersections of ecosystem services and common-pool resources literature: An interdisciplinary encounter. Environmental Science and Policy, 94, 72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.021
Russell, M. G. y Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2017). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 114-131. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024
Scheidel, A. (2013). Flows, funds and the complexity of deprivation: Using concepts from ecological economics for the study of poverty. Ecological Economics, 86, 28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.019
Schepper-Valiquette, B. (2014). Le concept de Décroissance Économique Chez Serge Latouche: Une Résistance au Capitalisme. https://archipel.uqam.ca/6658/
Sherman, T. F. (2018). Energy, entropy and the flow of nature. Oxford University Press.
Smulders, S. (1995). Entropy, Environment, and Endogenous Economic Growth. International Tax and Public Finance, 319-340. doi: 10.1007/BF00877504
Steiner, U. K. y Tuljapurkar, S. (2020). Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain. Theoretical Population Biology, 133, 159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.01.003
Struchtrup, H. (2020). Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics—The Nonequilibrium Perspective. Entropy, 22(7). doi: 10.3390/e22070793
Tame, J. R. (2019). Approaches to Entropy. Springer Nature Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2315-7
Vargo, S. L., Koskela-Huotari, K., Baron, S., Edvardsson, B. y Reynoso, J. (2017). A systems perspective on markets – Toward a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 79, 260-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.011
Vatn, A. (2020). Institutions for sustainability—Towards an expanded research program for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 168. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106507
Velásquez, A. (2007). La organización, el sistema y su dinámica: una versión desde Niklas Luhmann. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, (61), 129-155.
Vivien, F. D., Nieddu, F., Befort, N., Debref, R. y Giampietro, M. (2019). The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
Whiting, K., Konstantakos, L., Carrasco, A. y Carmona, L. G. (2018). Sustainable Development, Wellbeing and Material Consumption: A Stoic Perspective. Sustainability, 10(2). doi: 10.3390/su10020474
Zhavoronkov, A. y Litovchenko, M. (2013). Biomedical Progress Rates as New Parameters for Models of Economic Growth in Developed Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 5936-5952.
Agbinya, J. I. (2020). Markov Chain and its Applications. In J. I. Agbinya, Applied Data Analytics: Principles and Applications (p. 300). River Publishers.
Arboleda-Naranjo, R. (2017). Estructuras disipativas en la comunicación y el comportamiento organizacional. Razón y Palabra, 21(2), 498-521. Link Bermejo, R. (2011). Manual para una economía sostenible. Catarata.
Berthet, E. T., Segrestin, B. y Hickey, G. M. (2016). Considering agro-ecosystems as ecological funds for collective design: New perspectives for environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.005
Bohórquez, L. E. (2013). La organización empresarial como sistema adaptativo complejo. Estudios Gerenciales, 29(127), 258-265. Link
Camarena, J. L. (2016). La organización como sistema: el modelo organizacional contemporáneo. Oikos Polis, Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, 1(1), 135-174. Link
Candas, S., Siala, K. y Hamacher, T. (2019). Sociodynamic modeling of small-scale PV adoption and insights on future expansion without feed-in tariffs. Energy Policy, 125, 521-536. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.029
Castaldo, M. (2012). Economy of degrowth and localization: theories and perspectives. Università Ca' Foscari Venezia. Link
Cavalcanti, C. (2010). Conceptions of Ecological Economics: its Relationship with Mainstream and Environmental Economics. Estudos Avançados, 53-67.
Ceptureanu, E. G., Ceptureanu, S. I. y Popescu, D. I. (2017). Relationship between Entropy, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Organizational Capabilities in Romanian Medium Sized Enterprises. Entropy, 2-17. doi: 10.3390/e19080412
Charonis, G. K. (2012). Degrowth, steady state economics and the circular economy: three distinct yet increasingly converging alternative discourses to economic growth for achieving environmental sustainability and social equity. Sustainability - Missing points in the development dialogue (pp. 1-18). Bristol.
Chong, J. L. y Olesen, K. (2017). A Technology-Organization-Environment Perspective on Ecoeffectiveness: A Meta-analysis. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1-26. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1441
Cojanu, V. (2009). Georgescu-Roegen’s entropic model: a methodological appraisal. Emerald publishing, 36(3), 274-286. doi: 10.1108/03068290910932756
Cornejo, A. (2004). Capítulo 2: Complejidad Organizacional. In A. Cornejo, Complejidad y caos. Guía para la administración del siglo XXI.
D'Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., ... Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716-734. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V. y Schouten, G. (2018). Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi‐stakeholder Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 333-356. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6
Epanchin-Niell, R. S. (2017). Economics of invasive species policy and management. Biol Invasions, 3333-3354. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1406-4
Farrell, K. N. y Mayumi, K. (2009). Time horizons and electricity futures: An application of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s general theory of economic production. Energy, 34(3), 301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.002
Fernhaber, S. A. y Stark, A. Y. (2019). Biomimicry: New insights for entrepreneurship scholarship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00137
Fistola, R., Gargiulo, C. y La Roca, C. A. (2020). Rethinking vulnerability in city-systems: A methodological proposal to assess “urban entropy”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 85. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106464
Foley, D. K. (2015). Dilemmas of Economic Growth. Eastern Economic Journal, 283-295.
Fontini, F. (2009). Probability and uncertainty: The legacy of georgescu-roegen. Metroeconomica, 60(2), 324-342.
Foster, J. (2011). Capitalism and Degrowth—An Impossibility Theorem. Monthly review, 26-33. doi: 10.14452/MR-062-08-2011-01_2
Franco, M. (2018). Searching for a Scientific Paradigm in Ecological Economics: The History of Ecological Economic Thought, 1880s–1930s. Ecological Economics, 153, 195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.022
Ganesh, S. S. y Joseph, J. (2011). Exploring perceived organisational formalisation and performance review system complexity as predictors of executive alienation in performance review systems. IIMB Management Review, 23(4), 197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2011.07.001
Gheorghică, A. E. (2012). The Emergence of la Decroissance. Ces Working Papers, 47, 60-72. Link
Giampietro, M. (2019). On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001
Giannakis, M., Dubey, R., Vlachos, I. y Ju, Y. (2020). Supplier sustainability performance evaluation using the analytic network process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119439
Goklany, I. M. (2002). The Globalization of Human Well-Being. Policy Analysis, (447), 1-20. Link
Gowdy, J. (2005). The death of homo economicus: is there life after welfare economics? Emerald Publishing, 32(11), 924-938. doi: 10.1108/03068290510623771
Haapanen, L. y Tapio, P. (2016). Economic growth as phenomenon, institution and ideology: a qualitative content analysis of the 21st century growth critique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3492-3503. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.024
Harribey, J. M. (2007). Les théories de la décroissance : enjeux et limites. Cahiers français, «Développement et environnement», (337), 20-26.
Hasenheit, M., Gerdes, H., Kiresiewa, Z. y Beekman, V. (2016). Summary report on the social, economic and environmental impacts of the bioeconomy. Biostep, 2-29.
Heinzel, C. (2013). Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 251-271. doi: 10.1093/cje/bes060
Henry, G., Pahun, J. y Trigo, E. (2014). La Bioeconomía en América Latina: oportunidades de desarrollo e implicaciones de política e investigación. FACES, 125-141. http://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/2112/
Hestad, D., Tàbara, J. D. y Thornton, T. F. (2020). The three logics of sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations: a multi-disciplinary review. Sustainability Science. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00883-x
Iorgulescu, R. I., Polimeni, J. M. y Balan, M. (2015). Bioeconomic sustainability and modelling energy systems. Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 9(1), 46-59. doi:10.1504/PIE.2015.069840
Karakaya, E. y Nuur, E. K. (2018). Social sciences and the mining sector: Some insights into recent research trends. Resources Policy, 58, 257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.014
Kay, J. (2019). The concept of the corporation. Business History, 61(7), 1129-1143. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1509956
Kerschner, C. (2010). Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019
Kraśnicka, T., Głód, W. y Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2018). Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 737-769. doi: 10.1007/s11846-017-0229-0
Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S. y Brändle, L. (2020). Entrepreneurship and the sustainable bioeconomy transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.003
Larsen, J. K., Lindhard, S. M., Brunoe, T. D. y Jensen, K. N. (2018). The Relation between Pre-planning, Commissioning and Enhanced Project Performance. Construction Economics and Building, 18(2), 1-14. doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v18i2.5762
Leff, H. S. (2021). Energy and Entropy. A Dynamic Duo. CRC Press.
Lenfant, J. S. (2018). Probabilising the consumer: Georgescu-Roegen, Marschak and Quandt on the modelling of the consumer in the 1950s. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(1), 36-72. doi: 10.1080/09672567.2017.1415949
Levallois, C. (2010). Can de-growth be considered a policy option? A historical note on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and the Club of Rome. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2271-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.020
Lomas, P. L. y Giampietro, M. (2017). Environmental accounting for ecosystem conservation: Linking societal and ecosystem metabolisms. Ecological Modelling, 346, 10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.12.009
López, M. E., Arias, L. y Rave, S. N. (2006). Las organizaciones y la evolución administrativa. Scientia Et Technica, 2(31), 147-152. doi: 10.22517/23447214.6409
Lukinaitė, E. y Sondaitė, J. (2017). Mindset of employees working in a matrix organizational structure. Business. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 144-151. doi: 10.3846/btp.2017.015
Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U. y Vivien, F. -D. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 1741-1747.doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017
Melnik, S. S. y Usatenko, O. V. (2018). Entropy of high-order Markov chains beyond the pair correlations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 506, 208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.025
Mohammadian, M. (2004). La Bioeconomía: Un nuevo paradigma socioeconómico para el siglo XXl. Dialnet, 57-70.
Morgan, G. (1998). Imágenes de la Organización. Alfaomega.
Norberg, J. (2016). Progress: Ten reasons to look forward to the future. Oneworld Publications.
Pauliuk, S. y Hertwich, E. G. (2015). Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies. Ecological Economics, 119, 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.012
Pinker, S. (2018). En defensa de la ilustración. Por la razón, la ciencia, el humanismo y el progreso. Paidós.
Pulgarín, S. A. (2013). De las Organizaciones: Reflexiones y aproximaciones desde la biología y la complejidad. Criterio Libre, 11(18), 195-216. doi: 10.18041/1900- 0642/criteriolibre.2013v11n18.1131
Rivas, L. (2006). Implicaciones de la teoría de la complejidad en la organización, los procesos, los empleados y los modelos de dirección estratégica. I.I.E.S.C.A., 130-144. Link
Rodela, R., Tucker, C. M., Šmid-Hribar, M., Sigura, M., Bogataj, N., Urbanc, M. y Gunya, A. (2019). Intersections of ecosystem services and common-pool resources literature: An interdisciplinary encounter. Environmental Science and Policy, 94, 72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.021
Russell, M. G. y Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2017). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 114-131. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024
Scheidel, A. (2013). Flows, funds and the complexity of deprivation: Using concepts from ecological economics for the study of poverty. Ecological Economics, 86, 28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.019
Schepper-Valiquette, B. (2014). Le concept de Décroissance Économique Chez Serge Latouche: Une Résistance au Capitalisme. https://archipel.uqam.ca/6658/
Sherman, T. F. (2018). Energy, entropy and the flow of nature. Oxford University Press.
Smulders, S. (1995). Entropy, Environment, and Endogenous Economic Growth. International Tax and Public Finance, 319-340. doi: 10.1007/BF00877504
Steiner, U. K. y Tuljapurkar, S. (2020). Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain. Theoretical Population Biology, 133, 159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.01.003
Struchtrup, H. (2020). Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics—The Nonequilibrium Perspective. Entropy, 22(7). doi: 10.3390/e22070793
Tame, J. R. (2019). Approaches to Entropy. Springer Nature Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2315-7
Vargo, S. L., Koskela-Huotari, K., Baron, S., Edvardsson, B. y Reynoso, J. (2017). A systems perspective on markets – Toward a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 79, 260-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.011
Vatn, A. (2020). Institutions for sustainability—Towards an expanded research program for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 168. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106507
Velásquez, A. (2007). La organización, el sistema y su dinámica: una versión desde Niklas Luhmann. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, (61), 129-155.
Vivien, F. D., Nieddu, F., Befort, N., Debref, R. y Giampietro, M. (2019). The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
Whiting, K., Konstantakos, L., Carrasco, A. y Carmona, L. G. (2018). Sustainable Development, Wellbeing and Material Consumption: A Stoic Perspective. Sustainability, 10(2). doi: 10.3390/su10020474
Zhavoronkov, A. y Litovchenko, M. (2013). Biomedical Progress Rates as New Parameters for Models of Economic Growth in Developed Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 5936-5952.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
