Vacíos en la literatura sobre filosofía de la educación ambiental: una revisión de las corrientes de la filosofía ambiental

Abstract

Abstract

This article is a preliminary product of the research project “A proposal of guidelines for environmental training in Colombian Higher Education” carried out with Universidad Antonio Nariño during the years 2011and 2012. There are two objectives to be achieved: to demonstrate the void of literature on environmental education philosophy and to show that, despite the epistemological reflections on environmental philosophy are poor, the literature on trends in environmental philosophy is prolific. Thus, the order of the presentation is, first, a literature review on environmental education philosophy;, secondly, a literature review on environmental philosophy; and in third place, an analysis of the main trends, namely, deep ecology, conservation biology, bioregionalism and ecofeminism.

Keywords:

Ecología profunda

biología de la conservación

biorregionalismo

ecofeminismo

Deep ecology

conservation biology

bioregionalism

ecofeminism

References

 Anthony, R. (2010). Building a Sustainable Future for Animal Agriculture: An Environmental Virtue Ethic of Care Approach within the Philosophy of Technology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(2),123-144.

 Armsworth, P. R.; Daily, G. C.; Kareiva, P. y Sanchirico, J. N. (2006). Land market feedbacks can undermine
biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
103(14), 5403-5408.

 Bode, M.; Wilson, K. A.; Brooks, T. M.; Turner, W. R.; Mittermeier, R. A.; McBride, M. F.; Underwood, E. C. etal. (2008). Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(17), 6498-6501.

 Chadès, I.; McDonald-Madden, E.; McCarthy, M. A.; Wintle, B.; Linkie, M. y Possingham, H. P. (2008). When
to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(37), 13936-13940.

 Chan, K. M. A. y Daily, G. C. (2008). The payoff of conservation investments in tropical countryside.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(49), 19342-19347.

 Corcoran, P. y Sievers, E. (1994). Reconceptualizing environmental education: five possibilities. Journal of
Environmental Education, 25, 4-8. doi:10.1080/00958964.1994.9941958

 De Laplante, K. (2004). Can you teach environmental philosophy without being an environmentalist?
Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8(2-3),198-212.

 Elias, J. y Merriam, S. (1995). Philosophical foundations of adult education (2nd ed.). Malabar FL: Kreiger.

 Evanoff, R. (2007). Bioregionalism and cross-cultural dialogue on a land ethic. Ethics, Place and Environment, 10(2), 141-156.

 Galić, B. y Geiger, M. (2007). From domination logic toward ethics of care - Conceptual foundations of ecofeminism. Socijalna Ekologija, 16(1), 17-33.

 Geiger, M. (2002). Spiritual aspects of ecofeminism. Socijalna Ekologija, 11(1-2), 15-27.

 Geiger, M. y Zeman, Z. (2010). Place of living and integral sustainability - Vitality of local in a globalized world. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 19(3), 377-400.

 Gold, J. R.; Revill, G. y Haigh, M. J. (1996). Interpreting the dust bowl: Teaching environmental philosophy
through film. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(2), 209-221.

 Gómez, M. y De Puig, I. (2003). Ecodiálogo, Environmental Education and Philosophical Dialogue.The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 16(4), 37-40.

 Goralnik, L. y Nelson, M. P. (2011). Framing a philosophy of environmental action: Aldo Leopold, John Muir, and the importance of community. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(3), 181-192.

 Gray, R. (2007). Practical bioregionalism: A philosophy for a sustainable future and a hypothetical transition
strategy for Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.Futures, 39(7), 790-806.

 Hotam, Y. (2010). Ecology and Pedagogy: On the educational implications of postwar environmental philosophy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(3-4), 478- 487.

 Howarth, R. B. (2007). Adaptive management and the philosophy of environmental policy. Perspectives in
Biology and Medicine, 50(3), 453-458.

 Inhaber, H. (1975). Philosophy and limitations ofenvironmental indices. Social Indicators Research, 2(1),39-51.

 James, G. A. (1998). The construction of India in some recent environmental philosophy. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 2(1), 3-20.

 Kark, S.; Levin, N.; Grantham, H. S. y Possingham, H. P.(2009). Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 106(36), 15368-15373.

 Kennet, M. (2007). Editorial: Progress in Green Economics: Ontology, concepts and philosophy.Civilisation and the lost factor of reality in social and environmental justice. International Journal of GreenEconomics, 1(3-4), 225-249.

 Li, P.; Huang, Z.; Ren, H.; Liu, H. y Wang, Q. (2010). The Evolution of Environmental Management Philosophy
Under Rapid Economic Development in China.

 ________. (2011). The evolution of environmental management philosophy under rapid economic development in China. Ambio, 40(1), 88-92.

 Light, A. (2002). Contemporary environmental ethics from Metaethics to public philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 33(4), 427-449.

 Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2001). Efficient environmental legislation - On different philosophies of pollution control in Europe. Journal of Environmental Law, 13(1), 75-86.

 Luck, G. W.; Rickettst, T. H.; Daily, G. C. y Imhoff, M. (2004). Alleviating spatial conflict between people and
biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1), 182-186.

 Macauley, D. (2005). The flowering of environmental roots and the four elements in Presocratic philosophy:
From Empedocles to Deleuze and Guattari. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 9(3), 281-314.

 Markus, T. (2003a). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.

 ________. (2003b). "A head into nowhere". Lewis Mumford and the ecological criticism of technological civilization. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(1-2), 27-45.

 ________. (2003c). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.

 ________. (2003d). More-than-human-world. Deep ecology as environmental philosophy. Socijalna Ekologija, 12(3-4), 143-163.

 ________. (2004). Ecology and biology: Environmental implications of contemporary biological theories.
Socijalna Ekologija, 13(2), 129-151.

 Nash, C. (1999). Environmental history, philosophy and difference: Feminist perspectives on historical and
contemporary human-environmental relations. Documents d’Analisi Geografica, (35), 61-72.

 ________.(2000). Environmental history, philosophy and difference. Journal of Historical Geography, 26(1), 23-27.

 Park, C. D. (1984). Towards a philosophy of environmental education. Environmental Education & Information, 3(1), 3-15.

 Parkin, J. (1992). A philosophy for multiattribute evaluation in environmental impact assessments. Geoforum, 23(4), 467-475.

 Pfister, L. F. (2007). Environmental ethics and some probing questions for traditional Chinese philosophy.
Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34(Suppl.), 101-123.

 Plumwood, V. (1999). The struggle for environmental philosophy in Australia. Worldviews: Environment,
Culture, Religion, 3(2), 157-178.

 Salleh, A. (1996). Social ecology and "the man question". Environmental Politics, 5(2), 258-273.

 ________. (2003). Ecofeminism as sociology. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 14(1), 61-74.

 ________. (2009). The dystopia of technoscience: Anecofeminist critique of postmodern reason. Futures,41(4), 201-209.

 Schultz, J. R.; Simpson, S. y Elfessi, A. M. (2011). The environmental action and philosophy matrix: An
exploratory study of the environmental attitudes ofrecreation management and environmental studies students. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2),98-108.

 Scott, D. (2004). Transforming the "Market-Model University": Environmental philosophy, citizenship and
the recovery of the humanities. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8(2-3), 162-184.

 Sekercioglu, Ç. H.; Ehrlich, P. R.; Daily, G. C.; Aygen, D.; Goehring, D. y Sandí, R. F. (2002). Disappearance of
insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(1), 263-267.

 Taylor, B. (1997). Earthen spirituality or cultural genocide? Radical environmentalism’s appropriation of
Native American spirituality. Religion, 27(2), 183-215.

 ________. (2001a). Earth and nature-based spirituality (Part I): From deep ecology to radical environmentalism.
Religion, 31(2), 175-193.

 ________. (2001b). Earth and nature-based spirituality (Part II): From earth first! and bioregionalism to scientific
paganism and the new age. Religion, 31(3), 225-245.

 Thompson, P. B. y Whyte, K. P. (2011). What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World? Journal
of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Forthcoming.

 Tyburski, W. (2008). Origin and development of ecological philosophy and environmental ethics and their impact on the idea of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 16(2), 100-108.

 Utsler, D. (2009). Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics as a model for environmental philosophy. Philosophy Today,
53(2), 173-178.

 Walter, P. (2009). Philosophies of adult environmental education. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(1), 3-25.

 Wilson, K. A.; McBride, M. F.; Bode, M. y Possingham, H.P. (2006). Prioritizing global conservation efforts.
Nature, 440(7082), 337-340.