Especificación de un modelo de hipermetropía sociopolítica

Abstract

The process consisting in ensuring that natural disasters and distant environmental catastrophes are not linked to the personal situation, or local issues are not of such magnitude thay they involve a conservation action, is known as environmental hyperopia. In this sense, the present article aims to specify a model for the study of this perceptual bias that explains the relationship between nature and humanity. To that end, a documental study was carried on RADALYC, DIALNET and LATINDEX databases during the period 2010 to 2014 in Articles with ISSN and DOI record concerning environmental hyperopia. The model specified includes eight dimensions referring the perceptual bias with respect to local and residential water supply. In reference to the state of knowledge, the specification was proven to be able to anticipate analysis scenarios, perceptual structures, decision-making and behavior in terms of water availability and the needs / expectations of local consumption.

Keywords:

Catástrofes ambientales

desastres naturales

abastecimiento de agua

percepción de riesgos

comportamientos proambientales

environmental catastrophes

natural disasters

water supply

perception of risk

Pro-environmental behaviors

References

Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J., Sevillano, V. y Cortés, B. (2005). La estructura de las creencias sobre la problemática ambiental. Psicothema, 17(2), 257-262.

Basar, U. (2011). Environmental psychology, urban planning and economics: intersection crossroad & tangents. Asian Conference Psychology and the Behavior Sciences. Osaka, Japan.

Comisión Nacional del Agua. (2008). Estadísticas del Agua en México. México: Conagua.

Comisión Nacional del Agua. (2012). Bancos de agua en México. México: Conagua.

Corral, V., Bonnes, M., Tapia, C., Fraijo, B., Frías, M. y Carrus, G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainable orientation the affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 34-43.

Corral, V., Fraijo, B. y Pinheiro, J. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: present, past, and future orientation and their relationships with water conservation behavior. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 40(2), 139-147.

Corral, V., Fraijo, B. y Tapia, C. (2008). Un registro observacional del consumo individual de agua; aplicaciones a la investigación de la conducta sustentable. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 34(1), 79-96.

Frías, M., Rodríguez, A. y Corral, V. (2009). Análisis de factores que influyen en el desarrollo de normas ambientales y en la conducta anti-ecológica. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 43(2), 309-322.

García, C. y Bustos, J. (2013). Los estudios psicológicos de la sustentabilidad hídrica. Aplicaciones al sistema tarifario de consumo. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 139(1), 65-90.

García, R., Real, J. y Romay, J. (2005). Temporal and spatial dimensions in the perception of environmental problems: an investigation of the concept of environmental hyperopia. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 5-10.

García, R., Stea, D., Real, J., Coreno, V. y Elguea, S. (2013). Psychology, participation and environmental policy marking. En García, R. (Coord.), Readings of the Prestige disaster. Contribution from the social sciences (pp. 132-147). Coruña: University of the Coruña.

Gilford, R. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1-12.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática. (2010). Mujeres y hombres en México. México: Inegi.

Larson, K., White, D., Gober, P., Harlan, S. y Wutih, A. (2009). Divergent perspectives on water resource sustainability in a public policy science context. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 1012-1023.

Lucio, H. y Pinheiro, J. (2013). Dimensões ecológicas do aquecimento global conforme a visão adolescentes brasileiros. Estudos de Psicologia, 18(2), 173-182.

Milfont, T., Sibley, C. y Duckitt, J. (2010). Testing the moderating role of the components of norm activation on the relationship between values and environmental behavior. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 4(1), 124-131.

Moser, G. y Uzzell, D. (2004). Psychology and the challenge of global environmental change. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, 4, 1-4.

Pol, E. y Castrechini, A. (2013). Disrupción en la educación para la sostenibilidad? Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 335-349.

Rathzel, N. y Uzzell, D. (2012). Mending the beach between labour and nature: environmental engagements of trade unions and the North-South divide. Interface, 4(2), 81-100.

Real, J. y García, R. (2001). Dimensiones de la preocupación ambiental: una aproximación a la hipermetropía ambiental. Estudios de Psicología, 22(1), 87-96.

Tronu, G. (2011). General environmental attitudes and beliefs: the spatial bias and the NHIP scale. Tesi di Dottorato. Universita di Roma.

United Nations Habitat. (2010). Sick water? The central role of wastewater management in sustainable. A rapid response assessment. Birkiland: Autor.

United Nations Water. (2013). Water security & the global water agenda. Ontario: United Nations University.

Uzzel, D. (2000). The psychospatial dimension of global environmental problem. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307-318.

Uzzel, D. (2004). From local to global. A case of environmental hyperopia. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, 4, 6-9.

Uzzell, D., Rice, H., Ballantine, H. y Podlucka, D. (1994). Environmental hyperopia. 13th IAPS Conference, University of Manchester, 13-15 July.

Vervoort, J., Hoogstra, M., Kok, K., Van Lammeren, R., Bregt, A. y Janssen, R. (2014). Visualizing stakeholder perspectives for reflection and dialogue on scale dynamics in social ecological systems. Human Ecology Review, 20(2), 157-181.