PDF (Español)
FLIP
##plugins.gregg.article.details.published##: 2014-01-01
Como Citar
Borge, B. (2014). -. Discusiones Filosóficas, 15(24), 163–180. Recuperado de https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/759
Fomatos de Citação
Autores
Resumo
-
Palavras-chave:
Referências
Bohr, N. El cuanto de acción y la descripción de la naturaleza. Madrid: Alianza, 1988. Impreso.
Boyd, R. N. “What Realism Implies and What it Does Not”. Dialectica. 1989: 5-29. Print.
Carnap, R. Fundamentación lógica de la física. Barcelona: Alianza, 1985. Impreso.
Copérnico, N. Sobre las revoluciones. Madrid: Tecnos, 1987. Impreso.
Duhem, P. Sozein ta phainomena: Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée. Paris: J. Vrin, 1990. Imprimé.
Hacking, I. “Experimentation and Scientific Realism”. Philosophical Topics. 1982: 71-87. Print.
Harman, G. “The Inference to the Best Explanation”. Philosophical Review. 1965: 88-95. Print.
Kuhn, T. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económico, 1975. Impreso.
Laudan, L. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”. Philosophy of Science. 1981: 19-48. Print.
Lipton, P. “Truth, Existence, and the Best Explanation”. A. A. Derksen (ed.). The Scientific Realism of Rom Harré. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1994. Print.
Mach, E. “The Economical Nature of Physical Inquiry”. Popular Scientific Lectures. La Salle: Open Court, 1986. Print.
Popper, K. R. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper and Row, 1959. Print.
Psillos, S. Scientific realism: how science tracks truth. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.
Putnam, H. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Print.
Russell, B. The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1927. Print.
Sellars, W. F. Phenomenalism. Science, Perception and Reality. New York: The Humanities Press, 1963. Print.
Votsis, I. “Is structure not enough?” Philosophy of Science. 2003: 879-890. Print.
Worrall, J. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica. 1989: 99-124. Print.
Boyd, R. N. “What Realism Implies and What it Does Not”. Dialectica. 1989: 5-29. Print.
Carnap, R. Fundamentación lógica de la física. Barcelona: Alianza, 1985. Impreso.
Copérnico, N. Sobre las revoluciones. Madrid: Tecnos, 1987. Impreso.
Duhem, P. Sozein ta phainomena: Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée. Paris: J. Vrin, 1990. Imprimé.
Hacking, I. “Experimentation and Scientific Realism”. Philosophical Topics. 1982: 71-87. Print.
Harman, G. “The Inference to the Best Explanation”. Philosophical Review. 1965: 88-95. Print.
Kuhn, T. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económico, 1975. Impreso.
Laudan, L. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”. Philosophy of Science. 1981: 19-48. Print.
Lipton, P. “Truth, Existence, and the Best Explanation”. A. A. Derksen (ed.). The Scientific Realism of Rom Harré. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1994. Print.
Mach, E. “The Economical Nature of Physical Inquiry”. Popular Scientific Lectures. La Salle: Open Court, 1986. Print.
Popper, K. R. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper and Row, 1959. Print.
Psillos, S. Scientific realism: how science tracks truth. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.
Putnam, H. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Print.
Russell, B. The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1927. Print.
Sellars, W. F. Phenomenalism. Science, Perception and Reality. New York: The Humanities Press, 1963. Print.
Votsis, I. “Is structure not enough?” Philosophy of Science. 2003: 879-890. Print.
Worrall, J. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica. 1989: 99-124. Print.
