How to Cite
Aguirre García, J. C. (2008). Reply to: is incommensurability incomparability?. Discusiones Filosóficas, 9(13), 113–125. Retrieved from https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/691

Authors

Juan Carlos Aguirre García
Universidad del Cauca
coofilosofia@unicauca.edu.co

Abstract

This text raises a discussion with article Is incommensurability incomparability?, such discussion is begun from two elements: first, the reconstruction that the author makes of the Kuhn's concept of incommensurability; second, the holes that she leaves in the exhibition from the structuralist answer to the problem of the rational comparison of theories rivals and the omission of the solid criticism that have been made to this posture. This text, besides being a discussion, seeks to clarify aspects of the work of Kuhn that have been neglected and to examine critically the solution that the Structuralism sketched as promissory.

BALZER, W., MOULINES, C. y SNEED, J. (1987). An Architectonic for Science; The Structuralist Program. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

CHEN, X. (1997). "Thomas Kuhn's latest notion of incommensurability". En: Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28, pp. 257-273.

FALGUERA, J. L. (2004). "Las revoluciones científicas y el problema de la inconmensurabilidad". En: González, W. (Ed.) Análisis de Thomas Kuhn: Las revoluciones científicas. Madrid: Trotta, pp. 177-224.

FLÓREZ, D. (2007). "¿Es la inconmensurabilidad incomparabilidad?" En: Discusiones Filosóficas, 8:11, Enero-Diciembre, pp. 49-60.

KITCHER, P. (1982). "Implications of Incommensurability". En: PSA: Prceedings of the Bienal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2: Symposia and Invited Papers, pp. 689-703.

KUHN, T. S. (1970a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2 ed.

_________. (1970b). "Reflections on my Critics". En: Lakatos, I. y Musgrave, A. (Eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231-278.

_________. (1976). "Theory-Change as Structure-Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism". En: Erkenntnis, 10, 179-199.

_________. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

_________. (1977a). "Second Thoughts on Paradigms". En: [1977], 293-319.

_________. (1977b). "Objetivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice". En: [1977], 320-339.

_________. (1979). "Metaphor in Science". En: Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 409-419.

_________. (1981). "What are Scientific Revolutions?", Occasional Paper #18, Center for Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge: MIT (Reimpreso en: Kruger, L., Daston, J. y Heidelberger, M. (Ed.), The Probabilistic Revolution, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987, 7-22).

_________. (1983). "Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability". En: Asquith, P. D. y Nickles, T. (Ed.), PSA 1982, Vol. 2, East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 669-688.

_________. (1989). "Possible Worlds in History of Science". En: Allen, S. (Ed.), Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences, Berlín: de Gruyter, 9-32.

MOULINES, C. U. (1991). Pluralidad y recursión; estudios epistemológicos. Madrid: Alianza.

PEARCE, D. (1987). Roads to Commensurability. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

_________. (1982). "Stegmüller on Kuhn and Incommensurability". En: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 33:4. (Dec.), pp. 389-396

SANKEY, H. (1993). "Kuhn's Changing Concept of Incommensurability". En: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44:4. (Dec.), pp. 759-774.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |