Selección de instrumentos económicos para incentivar el reciclaje de residuos de la construcción y demolición

Resumen

La selección de un instrumento de política ambiental usualmente requiere la consideración de un número significativo de criterios, a veces conflictivos entre sí. El objetivo de este artículo es priorizar los diferentes criterios fundamentales e instrumentos económicos que mejor estimulen el reciclaje de residuos generados en los procesos de construcción y demolición en el Valle de Aburrá, Colombia. Se usó el enfoque Proceso de Análisis Jerárquico para análisis multicriterio, incluyendo las opiniones de expertos de los sectores de la construcción y académico. Se encontró que el desempeño ambiental y sanitario es el criterio que cobra mayor relevancia, y la tasa por no demolición selectiva y no separación sería el instrumento económico más adecuado para incentivar
el reciclaje de este tipo de residuos.

Palabras clave:

instrumentos de política

reciclaje

gestión integral de residuos

análisis de decisión multicriterio

policy instruments

recycling

integral waste management

multicriteria decision analysis

Citas

Achillas, C., Moussiopoulos, N., Karagiannidis, A., Banias, G. y Perkoulidis, G. (2013). The use of multi‐ criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: A literature review. Waste Management and Research, 31(2), 115‐129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203

Álvarez, V. A. (24 de octubre de 2018). ¿Sabe usted a dónde van los escombros que salen de su casa? El Colombiano. https://bit.ly/3vH4an1

Barroso Domínguez, V. M. (2013). Gestión de RCD en la Unión Europea. En Análisis de la gestión de residuos de construcción y demolición en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía (pp. 73‐75). https://bit.ly/35WPKnG

Calvo, N., Varela‐Candamio, L. y Novo‐Corti, I. (2014). A dynamic model for construction and demolition (C&D) waste management in Spain: Driving policies based on economic incentives and tax penalties. Sustainability, 6(1), 416‐435.https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010416

Chávez, C. A., Villena, M. G., y Stranlund, J. K. (2009). The choice of policy instruments to control pollution under costly enforcement and incomplete information. Journal of Applied Economics, 12(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514‐0326(09)60013‐1

Chica‐Osorio, L. M. y Beltrán‐Montoya, J. M. (2018). Demolition and construction waste characterization for potential reuse identification. Revista DYNA, 85(206), 338‐347. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v85n206.68824

Chung, S. S. y Lo, C. W. H. (2003). Evaluating sustainability in waste management: The case of construction and demolition, chemical and clinical wastes in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 37(2), 119‐145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921‐3449(02)00075‐7

CONESCOMBROS. (2018). Suministro de agregados.

CORANTIOQUIA. (2018). Listado de gestores de RCD registrados ante CORANTIOQUIA.

CORNARE. (2018). Listado de gestores de RCD inscritos en la Jurisdición CORNARE.

European Comission. (2016). Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol.
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/eu‐construction‐and‐demolition‐waste‐protocol‐0_es

Gomes, C. F. S., Nunes, K. R. A., Helena Xavier, L., Cardoso, R. y Valle, R. (2008). Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega, 36(3), 395‐404. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OMEGA.2006.07.009

Goulder, L. H., y Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174.
https://doi.org/10.1093/REEP/REN005

Hao, J. L., Hills, M. J. y Tam, V. W. Y. (2008). The effectiveness of Hong Kong’s Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme. Waste Management and Research, 26(6), 553‐558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07085345

Huang, I. B., Keisler, J. y Linkov, I. (2011). Multi‐criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 3578‐3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

Iacovidou, E. y Purnell, P. (2016). Mining the physical infrastructure: Opportunities, barriers and interventions in promoting structural components reuse. Science of the Total Environment, 557, 791‐807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.098

Kartam, N., Al‐Mutairi, N., Al‐Ghusain, I. y Al‐Humoud, J. (2004). Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait. Waste Management, 24(10), 1049‐1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.06.003

Knoeri, C., Nikolic, I., Althaus, H. J. y Binder, C. R. (2014). Enhancing recycling of construction materials: An agent based model with empirically based decision parameters. Jasss, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2528

Konidari, P. y Mavrakis, D. (2007). A multi‐criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6235‐6257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.007

Kontrolgrün. (2018). Servicio de gestión integral de RCD.

Kourmpanis, B., Papadopoulos, A., Moustakas, K., Kourmoussis, F., Stylianou, M. y Loizidou, M. (2008). An integrated approach for the management of demolition waste in Cyprus. Waste Management & Research, 26(6), 573‐581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X08091554

Krejčí, J. y Stoklasa, J. (2018). Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: Why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 114, 97‐106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.060

Lu, W. y Yuan, H. (2011). A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Management, 31(6), 1252‐1260.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018

Majone, G. (1976). Choice among policy instrumentsfor pollution control. Policy Analysis, 2(4), 589‐613. Vol. 2, No. 4 (Fall 1976), pp. 589‐613

Marzouk, M. y Azab, S. (2014). Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 82, 41‐49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.015

Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. (2017). Resolución 0472 de 2017 (p. 18). http://www.andi.com.co/Uploads/3a‐RESOLUCION‐472‐DE‐2017.pdf

Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo sostenible e Instituto de Estudios Ambientales. (2017). Consultoría para el análisis y evaluación de la situación actual de la internalización de costos ambientales y en salud por la gestión de residuos sólidos en Colombia. Documento no publicado.

Municipio de Medellín. (2015). Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos‐PGIRS Municipio de Medellín 2016‐2027. Link

Nadazdi, A., Naunovic, Z. y Ivanisevic, N. (2022). Circular Economy in Construction and Demolition Waste Management in the Western Balkans: A Sustainability Assessment
Framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020871

Ospina, G. (10 de noviembre de 2017). Medellín busca recuperar el 25 % de los residuos sólidos. El Colombiano. https://bit.ly/3vJMs25

Poon, C. (1997). Management and recycling of demolition waste in Hong Kong. Waste Management & Research, 15(6), 561‐572. https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996.0111

Poon, C. S., Yu, A. T. W., See, S. C. y Cheung, E. (2004). Minimizing demolition wastes in Hong Kong public housing projects. Construction Management and Economics, 22(8), 799‐805. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000213283

Roussat, N., Dujet, C. y Méhu, J. (2009). Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis. Waste Management, 29(1), 12‐20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2008.04.010

Russell, C., y Vaughan, W. (2003). The choice of pollution control policy instruments in developing countries: arguments, evidence and suggestions. In H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2003/2004 (pp. 331–370).

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9‐26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377‐2217(90)90057‐I

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83‐98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Umar, U. A., Shafiq, N., Malakahmad, A., Nuruddin, M. F. & Khamidi, M. F. (2017). A review on adoption of novel techniques in construction waste management and policy. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19(4), 1361‐1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163‐016‐0534‐8

West, S. E., & Wolverton, A. (2005). Market‐based policies for pollution control in Latin America. Environmental Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean, 121–147.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1‐4020‐3774‐0_6

Wu, Z. y Yu, A. T. W. (2014). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Construction and Demolition Waste Management Strategies. Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 531‐538. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐642‐44916‐1

Zhang, F., Ju, Y., Santibanez González, E. D. R., Wang, A., Dong, P. y Giannakis, M. (2021). Evaluation of construction and demolition waste utilization schemes under uncertain environment: A fuzzy heterogeneous multi‐criteria decision‐making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127907