DOI: 10.17151/hpsal.2024.29.1.5
How to Cite
1.
Burgos-Dávila D, Medina-Zapata HJ, Potes-Morales LY. Survey on health and Healthy University: contribution to the process of formulating an Institutional Policy. Hacia Promoc. Salud [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Aug. 9];29(1):62-7. Available from: https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/hacialapromociondelasalud/article/view/9156

Authors

Delia Burgos-Dávila
Universidad del Valle
delia.burgos@correounivalle.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-6427
Perfil Google Scholar
Heidy Johana Medina-Zapata
Universidad del Valle
heidy.medina@correounivalle.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-777X
Perfil Google Scholar
Lina Yurany Potes-Morales
Universidad del Valle
lina.potes@correounivalle.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-2591
Perfil Google Scholar

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to design a survey that seeks to know the perception of the university community on the concepts of health, healthy university and constituent elements as a contribution to the formulation process of the construction of a healthy university policy. Methodology: Through a documentary analysis and guided by the review of experts and the referential framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), a survey was developed aimed at the university community. Results: A survey was built that can be applied online, which has four sections, the first on sociodemographic and institutional characterization, and the other three, each with a question focused on the key concepts of the study and 32 associated statements. The questions were of the “ranking” type, where potential respondents must compare affirmations with each other and sort them by preference. Conclusions: The construction process of this survey allows us to reflect the knowledge and interests of the community, identify priorities and meeting points between the diversity of positions that naturally inhabit a university. The concept of a healthy university and its transformation into a policy for the university requires a participatory process that accounts for collective action that shows the coordination and cooperation of key actors and the development of institutional capacities.

Robledo-Martínez R. La Promoción de la Salud en Colombia y su alcance en el complejo entramado político nacional (1990-2019). Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) [Internet]. 2022; 24(1): 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v24n1.103231

Came HA, Tudor K. The whole and inclusive university: a critical review of health promoting universities from Aotearoa New Zealand. Health Promot Int [Internet]. 2020; 35(1):102-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day091

Arroyo HV. Perspectivas y desafíos de promoción de la salud en Latinoamérica. Salud Publica Mex [Internet]. 2022; 64(6):576-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.21149/13655

Botero Suaza JC, Puerta Henao E, Schvarstzhaupt Lumertz J, Garcia Sonaglio R, Cerva Melo R, Famer Rocha C. Perspectivas teórico-prácticas sobre promoción de la salud en Colombia, Cuba y Costa Rica: revisión integrativa. Hacia Promoc. Salud. 2016; 21(2):59-73.

Simbarashe Tafireyi CG, Martin Grace J. The physical activity and health promotion activities of global university students: a review of reviews. Glob Health Promot [Internet]. 2022; 29(4):17579759221099308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759221099308

Dooris M, Wills J, Newton J. Theorizing healthy settings: A critical discussion with reference to Healthy Universities.Scand J Public Health [Internet]. 2014;42:7-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814544495

Faria MGA, Fernandes RC, Gallasch CH, Alves LVV. Contributions of the health-promoting universities’ movement: An integrative literature review. J Educ Health Promot. 2021; 10:114.

Dooris M, Doherty S. Healthy universities—time for action: a qualitative research study exploring the potential for a national programme. Health Promot Int [Internet]. 2010;2 5(1):94-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daq015

Duarte-Cuervo CY. Comprensión e implementación de la promoción de la salud en instituciones de educación superior en Colombia. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) [Internet]. 2015;17(6):899-911. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v17n6.44713

Pascoe GC, Attkisson CC. The Evaluation Ranking Scale: A new methodology for assessing satisfaction. Eval Program Plan [Internet]. 1983;6(3–4):335–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(83)90013-7

Rodriguez M, Couto MD, Díaz N. Modelo salutogénico: enfoque positivo de la salud. Una revisión de la literatura. Acta Odontol Venez. 2015; 53(3):1-12.

Thurston Drake F, Lyden ML, Kuo JH, Shen WT, Morris-Wiseman LF, Carty SE, et al. Optimizing the fellowship interview process: Perspectives from applicants and program directors of the comprehensive endocrine surgery fellowship program. Surgery [Internet]. 2021; 169(3):488-495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.037

Steel M, Seaton P, Christie D, Dallas J, Absalom I. Nurse perspectives of nurse-sensitive indicators for positive patient outcomes: A Delphi study. Collegian [Internet]. 2021; 28(2):145-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.02.009

Craxì L, Casuccio A, Amodio E, Restivo V. Who should get COVID-19 vaccine first? A survey to evaluate hospital workers’ opinion. Vaccines (Basel) [Internet]. 2021; 9(3):1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030189

Galicia Alarcón LA, Balderrama Trápaga JA, Edel Navarro R. Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos: propuesta de una herramienta virtual. Apertura [Internet]. 2017; 9(2):42-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v9n2.993

Sánchez-Ordóñez JM, Gimeno-Navarro MA. Healthy Universities: Concepts, Dimensions and Approaches for the Construction of Healthy University Environments. Hacia Promoc. Salud [Internet]. 2022; 27(1):234-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2022.27.1.16

Rincón-Méndez AY, Mantilla-Uribe BP. Universidades Promotoras de la Salud: Reflexión para su implementación desde los determinantes sociales de la salud. Univ Salud [Internet]. 2020; 22(1):24-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.22267/rus.202201.171

Suárez-Reyes M, Van den Broucke S. Participation of university community members in Health Promoting University (HPU) initiatives. Front Public Health [Internet]. 2023; 11:1217177. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217177

Darker CD, Mullin M, Doyle L, Tanner M, McGrath D, Doherty L, et al. Developing a health promoting university in Trinity College Dublin-overview and outline process evaluation. Health Promot Int [Internet]. 2023; 38(4):daab180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab180

Biscaia Hartmann J, Tribulato Rego A, Vieira Khoury J, Picinin Bernuci M, Ueda Yamaguchi M. E-Questionnaire on health knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP-Health) for Brazilian students in distance learning. Glob Health Action [Internet]. 2023;16(1):2153441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2153441

Sanci L, Williams I, Russell M, Chondros P, Duncan AM, Tarzia L, et al. Towards a health promoting university: descriptive
findings on health, wellbeing and academic performance amongst university students in Australia. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2022; 22(1):2430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14690-9

Siswati T, Margono, Husmarini N, Purnamaningrum YE, Paramashanti BA. Health-promoting university: the implementation of an integrated guidance post for non-communicable diseases (Posbindu PTM) among university employees. Glob Health Promot [Internet]. 2022; 29(3):31-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759211021363

Pérez-Wilson P, Marcos-Marcos J, Carrasco-Portiño M, Ruiz-Cantero MT, Alvarez-Dardet C. Asset map in a Chilean Health Promoting University: ‘a strategy for revitalization’. Health Promot Int [Internet]. 2022; 37(1):daab038. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab038

Reichel JL, Rigotti T, Tibubos AN, Werner AM, Schäfer M, Edelmann D, et al. Challenge Accepted! a Critical Reflection on How to Perform a Health Survey Among University Students-An Example of the Healthy Campus Mainz Project. Front Public Health [Internet]. 2021; 9:616437. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.616437
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |