Authors
Abstract
The contribution from the Speech Acts Theory of Searle to the fictional discourse is examined in this work. We accept that the meanings of linguistic statements used during a real discourse are the same meanings determining and establishing rules on the understanding between the author and the reader in the fictional discourse. According to this, a successful and creative communication by a fictional-work author is only made when he uses linguistic statements that follow the meanings of the words and linguistic conventions established in a real discourse. In order to make this idea convincing, in the first place, the concept of pretending and the concept of lying are contrasted through the analysis of the speech acts theory of Austin and Searle. In the second place, the features of the pretending act are questioned to show an examination of the fictional discourse beginning with the Speech theory and its acceptability. In the third place, analyze how the discourse of fiction does derogate from the rules for performing speech acts. Our conclusion is that by contrasting the serious utterances against the fictional utterances by the work of Carroll was a relevant issue that made possible the expansion of the understanding of how it is possible to create a literal speech acts in fictional works.
Keywords:
References
---. “Pretending”. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970. Print.
Bautista, A. Introducción a la pragmática de la ficción literaria. Cali: Universidad del Valle, 2011. Impreso.
Carrol, L. Through the Looking-Glass and what Alice Found There. Virginia: Virginia University, 1993. Online.
---. Alicia en el país de las maravillas. México, D.F.: Ed. Tomo, 2003. Impreso.
Gómez, A. L. Breve tratado sobre la mentira. Cali: Universidad del Valle, 2007. Impreso.
Iser, W. El acto de leer. Madrid: Ed. Taurus, 1987. Impreso.
Platón. La República. Madrid: Gredos, 1988. Impreso.
Searle, J. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. Print.
---. “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse”. New Literary History. 1975: 319-332. Print.
---. “¿Qué es un acto de habla?”. Cuartas, J. M. y C. Vega. Manual de filosofía del lenguaje. Cali: Universidad del Valle, 2003. Impreso.
---. Actos de habla. Madrid: Cátedra, 1986. Impreso.