How to Cite
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2013). Lo natural vs. las ciencias humanas: Mito, metodología y ontología. Discusiones Filosóficas, 14(22), 25–41. Retrieved from https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/720

Authors

Rögnvaldur D. Ingthorsson
Lund University, Sweden
Rognvaldur.Ingthorsson@fil.lu.se

Abstract

I argue that the human sciences (i.e. humanities, social - and behavioural sciences) should not try to imitate the methodology of the natural sciences. The human sciences study meaningful phenomena whose nature is decisively different from the merely physical phenomena studied by the natural sciences, and whose study therefore require different methods; meaningful phenomena do not obviously obey natural laws while the merely physical necessarily does. This is not to say that the human sciences do not study an objective reality about which we cannot have genuine knowledge. The notion of objective reality is discussed, and it is suggested that social constructions can be understood as objectively real entities.

Haack, Susan. ‘The same, only different’. Journal of Aesthetic Education. Aug. 2002: 34-9.

Haslanger, Sally. ‘Ontology and Social Construction’. Philosophical Topics. 1995: 95-125.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |