PDF (Español)
FLIP
Publication Date: 2012-01-01
How to Cite
Woleński, J. (2012). ¿Necesitamos reformar el viejo esquema t?. Discusiones Filosóficas, 13(20), 273–285. Retrieved from https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/645
More Citation Formats
Authors
Abstract
This paper critically comments Stephen Read's analysis of the T-scheme offered in his paper: "The Liar and the new T-scheme". I argue that Read misinterprets Tarski in some points and that the A-scheme introduced in Read's paper is either reducible to the old (Tarskian) T-scheme or raises essential doubts.
Keywords:
References
Dutillh Novaes, Catarina. “Tarski’s hidden theory of meaning: Sentences say exactly”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 41-64. Print.
Miller, David. “Verdades, antiguas y modernas”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jun. 2011: 207-227. Impreso.
Rahman, Shahid., Tero Tulenheimo and Emmanuel Genot. Eds. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. Print.
Read, Stephen. “The Truth-Schema and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 3-18. Print.
---. “Further thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 205-228. Print.
---. “The Liar and the new truth-Schema”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2010: 119-137. Print.
---. “Miller, Bradwardine and truth”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jul. 2011: 229-235. Print.
Sandu, Gabriel. “Read on the Liar”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2011: 277-290. Print.
Tarski, Alfred. “The concept of truth in formalized languages”. Logic, semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933. Print.
---. “The semantic concept of truth and the foundations of semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1944: 341-375. Print.
Woleński, Jan. “Read about T-scheme”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 199-203. Print.
---. Semantics and truth. Forthcoming.
Miller, David. “Verdades, antiguas y modernas”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jun. 2011: 207-227. Impreso.
Rahman, Shahid., Tero Tulenheimo and Emmanuel Genot. Eds. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. Print.
Read, Stephen. “The Truth-Schema and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 3-18. Print.
---. “Further thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 205-228. Print.
---. “The Liar and the new truth-Schema”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2010: 119-137. Print.
---. “Miller, Bradwardine and truth”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Ene.-Jul. 2011: 229-235. Print.
Sandu, Gabriel. “Read on the Liar”. Discusiones Filosóficas. Jul.-Dic. 2011: 277-290. Print.
Tarski, Alfred. “The concept of truth in formalized languages”. Logic, semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933. Print.
---. “The semantic concept of truth and the foundations of semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1944: 341-375. Print.
Woleński, Jan. “Read about T-scheme”. Unity, truth and the Liar. The modern relevance of medieval solutions to the Liar Paradox. Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo, Emmanuel Genot. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. 199-203. Print.
---. Semantics and truth. Forthcoming.
