PDF (Español)
FLIP
Authors
Abstract
There does not seem to be the "problem of consciousness", only various conundrums that come to the fore when we reflect on the special character of higher organisms. Roughly one might say that common to many puzzles about consciousness is the thought that human beings, at least, are aware that they are aware of material things, some of the states of their own bodies, and can monitor themselves thinking about these and other matters. In this paper I propose to use the analysis of certain relevant kinds of talk as a way of investigating how far some of the phenomena comprehended under the broad term 'consciousness' are socially constructed. By that I mean the question as to whether they are brought into being, or if already existing, are they modified in various ways, by social, that is interpersonal processes and structures. I shall work with the widely shared principle that the main instrument through which such creations and modifications come to be is language.
Keywords:
References
Davidson, Donald. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. Print.
Gibson, James J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. New York: Houghton Miflin, 1966. Print.
Hart, H. L. A. Law, liberty and morality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1963. Print.
Robinson, Daniel N. and Rom Harré. “On the primacy of duties”.Philosophy. Oct. 1995: 513-532. Print.
Shaver, Kelly G. The attribution of blame. New York: Springer Verlag, 1985. Print.
Strawson, Peter Frederick. Individuals. London: Methuen, 1964. Print.
Vygotsky, Lev S. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962. Print.
Watkins, Mary. Invisible guests: The development of imaginal dialogues. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1996. Print.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953. Print.
