¿Hay instancias válidas de la falacia de afirmación del consecuente?

Abstract

According to Massey there is no theory whatsoever behind the standard treatment of fallacies. Nevertheless, he agrees that the so called formal fallacies can falsify his claim. Since formal fallacies are invalid patterns of argumentation proscribed by logical theory, he purports to show that they can, anyhow, yield valid arguments. Massey chooses the fallacy of "affirmation of the consequent" and provides one example of it to support such claim. His underlying point is that while proofs of argument validity can be considered definitive and taken to have theoretical legitimacy, proofs of argument invalidity cannot. In this paper I will challenge Massey's example of an argument that instantiates the pattern known as "affirmation of the consequent" and yet is valid. I will argue that his example is not a genuine case of affirmation of the consequent, but a mere sham argument on which he has performed a trick.

Keywords:

Afirmación del consecuente

falacia

validez

invalidez

Massey

Affirmation of the consequent

fallacy

validity

invalidity

Massey

-

References

Bergmann, Merrie. et al. The logic book. New York: Random House, 1980. Print.

Biro, John. “Rescuing ‘begging the question’”. Metaphilosophy. Vol. 8, No. 4. 1977. Print.

Copi, Irving M. & Cohen, Carl. Introduction to logic. New York: Prentice Hall, 1998. Print.

Curd, Martin. Argument and analysis: an introduction to philosophy. St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1992. Print.

Govier, Trudy. “Reply to Massey”. Hansen & Pinto, Robert (Eds.). Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings. Pennsylvania: University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995. Print.

Hamblin, C. L. Fallacies. Vale Press: Newport News, 1970. Print.

Hansen, Hans & Pinto, Robert. (Eds.). Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings. Pennsylvania: University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995. Print.

Massey, Gerald J. “The fallacy behind fallacies”. Hansen, Hans & Pinto, Robert. (Eds.). Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings. Pennsylvania: University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995. Print.

Mates, Benson. Elementary logic. New York: Oxford University Press, 1972. Print.

Stebbing, Susan. A modern elementary logic. London: Methuen, 1976. Print.