How to Cite
Chalmers, D. (2007). The matrix as metaphysis . Discusiones Filosóficas, 8(11), 209–254. Retrieved from https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/603

Authors

David Chalmers
University of Arizona
chalmers@anu.edu.au

Abstract

This paper tries to defend the thesis that the scenario described in The Matrix does not correspond to any skeptical hypothesis. Quite the contrary, the experiences that one has inside the matrix can be as real as those one has in the external world. Furthermore, though the matrix' world is totally simulated, the experiences one has inside it do not have to be entirely false, they may be even true. To argue for these ideas, several hypotheses are examined. Finally, the objections raised against these theses are answered.

BOSTROM, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly 53:243-55. http://www.simulation-argument.com.

CHALMERS, D.J. (1990). How Cartesian dualism might have been true. http://consc.net/notes/dualism.html.

________________. (1994). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. http://consc.net/papers/computation.hmtl.

DENNETT, D.C. (1978). Brainstorms. In Where am I? MIT Press.

PUTNAM, H. (1975). The meaning of “meaning”. In Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge University Press.

________________. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge University Press.

SEARLE, J.R. (1984). Can computers think? In Minds, Brains, and Science. Harvard University Press.

THOMPSON, B. (2003). The Nature of Phenomenal Content. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.

WOLFRAM, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |