DOI: 10.17151/difil.2016.17.29.2
How to Cite
Briceño Domínguez, S. . (2016). The subject of change. Discusiones Filosóficas, 17(29), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.29.2

Authors

Sebastián Briceño Domínguez
Universidad de Concepción
josesbriceno@udec.cl
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3040-4869

Abstract

When facing the problem of temporary intrinsics, the dominant positions assume that the subject of change is a concrete particular, i.e., an object that instantiates intrinsic properties in a determinate temporal position. Minority positions either deny the existence of the subject of change or accept the latter as a contradictory subject. In this paper I argue (i) that the current solutions are unable to make sense of the changeable appearances; (ii) that this inability rests precisely on a deficient understanding of the subject of change; and (iii) that an understanding of the subject of change which is grounded on a more tolerant scheme of categories does allow us to make better sense of them. Under this scheme, of idealist roots, the subject of change must be understood as a “concrete universal”.

Armstrong, David M. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: University Press, 1997. Impreso.

Armstrong, David. Universals and Scientific Realism, vols. I y II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. Impreso.

Barker, Stephen. Flux: The Emergence of Time and Modality in a Metaphysically Dynamic Universe. The University of Nottingham, mayo 2016. Borrador inédito.

Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. New York: Dover, 1998. Impreso.

Bradley, Francis H. Appearance and Reality. 2a ed., 9a imp. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930. Impreso.

Briceño, Sebastián. “El regreso de Bradley y el problema de la unidadcompleja: ¿tropos al rescate?”. Crítica. 48 (143). 2016: 47-75. Impreso.

Brower, Jeffrey. “Aristotelian endurantism: a new solution to the problem of temporary intrinsics”. Mind. 119 (476). 2010: 883-905. Impreso.

Carmichael, Chad. “Deep Platonism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 91 (3). 2016: 307-328. Impreso.

Geach, Peter. God and the Soul. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969. Impreso.

Hartshorne, Charles. Creative Synthesis and Philosophical Method. La Salle: Open Court, 1970. Impreso.

Hegel, Georg W. F. The Science of Logic. Trad. George di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Impreso.

Johnston, Mark. “Is there a problem about persistence?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 61. 1987: 107-135. Impreso.

Lewis, David. “Tensing the copula”. Mind. 111 (441). 2002: 1-14. Impreso.

Lewis, David. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. Impreso.

Loux, Michael. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2006. Impreso.

Markosian, Ned. “A defense of presentism”. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 1. Dean Zimmerman (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 47-82. Impreso.

Mellor, David. Real Time II. New York: Routledge, 1998. Impreso.

Moore, George E. “External and internal relations”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series. 20. 1919: 40-62. Impreso.

Priest, Graham. In Contradiction. 2a ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Impreso.

Quine, Willard V. O. “Identity, ostension, and hypostasis”. The Journal of Philosophy. 47 (22). 1950: 621-633. Impreso.

Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996. Impreso.

Rorty, Richard. “Relations, external and internal.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7. Paul Edwards (Ed.). New York: Macmillan Company, 1967. 125-133. Impreso.

Sanford, David. “Determinates vs. determinables”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). En http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/determinatedeterminables Web. 14 sep. 2016.

Seibt, Johanna. “Beyond endurance and perdurance: recurrent dynamics”. Persistence. Christian Kanzian (Ed.). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008. 133-164. Impreso.

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Foundations for a metaphysics of pure process”. The Monist. 64 (1). 1981: 3-90. Impreso.

Sider, Theodore. Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Impreso.

Simons, Peter. “Particulars in particular clothing: three trope theories of substance”. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research. 54 (3). 1994: 553-575. Impreso.

Smart, John J. C. “The river of time”. Mind, New Series. 58 (232). 1949: 483-494. Impreso.

Stern, Robert. “Hegel, British idealism, and the curious case of the concrete universal”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 15 (1). 2007: 115-153. Impreso.

van Fraassen, Bas. Scientific Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Impreso.

van Inwagen, Peter. “Four-dimensional objects”. Noûs. 24 (2). 1990: 245-255. Impreso.

Whitehead, Alfred N. Process and Reality. David R. Griffin y Donald W. Sherburne (eds.). New York: The Free Press, 1978. Impreso.

Wiggins, David. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Impreso.

Williams, Donald C. “The myth of passage”. The Journal of Philosophy. 48 (15). 1951: 457-472. Impreso.

Zimmerman, Dean. “Persistence and presentism”. Philosophical Papers. 25 (2). 1996: 115–126. Impreso.

Zimmerman, Dean. “Temporary intrinsics and presentism”. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Peter van Inwagen y Dean Zimmerman (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. 206–221. Impreso.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |