pdf (Español (España))
FLIP
How to Cite
Jaramillo U, J. M. . (2018). The models of data in scientific theories. Discusiones Filosóficas, 19(33), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.7
More Citation Formats
Authors
Abstract
This paper intends to develop a reflection on the data models (DMs) in the empirical sciences, highlighting their importance for the representation of the phenomena that they occupy and for the evidence of these. At the same time, I present and discuss some of the criticisms that have been raised about the non-theoretical description of the intentional applications I in some theories that would lead to propose a modification in the empirical assertion (Ramsey-Sneed statement) that accompanies theories, are presented and discussed, as are the cases
of isolated hypotheses such as Ohm's law and of maximally comprehensive and all-encompassing physical theories such as the Theory of Everything and of great unification.
References
Balzer, Wolfgang. “On a New Definition of Theoreticity”. Dialectica 39. 2. 1985: 127-145. Print.
---. “Theoretical Terms. A New Perspective”. The Journal of Philosophy 83, 2. 1986: 71-90. Print.
---. “Theoretical Terms: Recent Developments”. Eds. W. Balzer and C.U. Moulines, 1996. 139-166. Print.
---. Teorías empíricas: modelos, estructuras y ejemplos. Madrid: Alianza, 1996. Impreso.
Balzer, Wolfgang, Bernhard Lauth and Gerhard Zoubek. “A Model of Science Kinematics”. Studia Logica 52. 1993: 519-548. Print.
Balzer, Wolfgang and Carlos Ulises Moulines. Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1966. Print.
Balzer, Wolfgang, Carlos Ulises Moulines and Joseph D. Sneed An Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987. Print.
Balzer, W., Joseph D. Sneed and Carlos Ulises Moulines Structuralist knowledge Representation. Paradigmatic Examples. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi, 2000. Print.
Díez, José A. y Carlos Ulises Moulines. Fundamentos de filosofía de ciencia. Barcelona, Ariel, 1997. Impreso.
Gädhe, Ulrich. “A Formal Approach to the Theory-Dependent Measurement”. Philosophia Naturalis 21, 1984: 266-272. Print.
---. “Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms”. Erkenntnis 32, 1990: 215-233. Print.
---. “Holism and the Empirical Claim of Theory-Nets”. Eds. Balzer, W. and C.U. Moulines. Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996: 167-190. Print.
---. “Holism, Underdetermination, and the Dynamic or Empirical Theories”. Synthese 130. 2002: 69-90. Print.
Kamlah, A. “An Improved Definition of ´Theoretical in a Given Theory. Erkenntnis, 10. 1976: 349-359. Print.
Kuhn, Thomas Samuel. “Postscript-1969”. In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: U. of Chicago P.2ª ed. aumentada, 1970: 174-210. Print.
Lorenzano, Pablo. “Base empírica global de contrastación, base empírica local de contrastacion”. Agora 31, 2. 2012: 71-107. Impreso.
Moulines, Carlos Ulises. Exploraciones metacientíficas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1982. Impreso.
---. “Chapter 1: Structuralism: The Basic Ideas”. Eds. Balzer W. and C.U. Moulines. 1966. Print.
---. “The basic core of simple equilibrium thermodinamics”. Eds. Balzer W. and C.U. Moulines. 2000: 307-332. Print.
---. “Models of Data, Theoretical Models, and Ontology. A Structuralist Perspective”. Eds. Hoffmann, M., J. Lenhard, and J.F. Seeger. Activity and Sign, New York: Springer, 2005: 325-333. Print.
---. “Explicación teórica y compromisos ontológicos: un modelo estructuralista. Enrahonar 37. 2005: 45-53. Print.
Sneed, Joseph D. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 2ª. ed. revisada, 1979. Print.
Suppes, P. “A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences”. Synthese 12, 1960: 287-301. Print.
Suppes. P. (1962). “Models of Data”. Eds. Nagel, E., P. Suppes, and A. Tarski. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proccedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford: Stanford U. P., 1962: . 252-261. Print.
Suppes, Patrick. “La estructura de las teorías y el análisis de datos”. Ed. P. Suppes.Estudios de Filosofía y Metodología de la Ciencia, Madrid: Alianza, 1988: 125-145. Print.
Tuomela, R. Theoretical Concepts. Wien-New York: Springer, 1973. Print.
Woodward, Jim. “Data, phenomena, and reliability. Philosophy of Science, Supplement 67. Sept., 2000: 47-76. Print.
---. “Theoretical Terms. A New Perspective”. The Journal of Philosophy 83, 2. 1986: 71-90. Print.
---. “Theoretical Terms: Recent Developments”. Eds. W. Balzer and C.U. Moulines, 1996. 139-166. Print.
---. Teorías empíricas: modelos, estructuras y ejemplos. Madrid: Alianza, 1996. Impreso.
Balzer, Wolfgang, Bernhard Lauth and Gerhard Zoubek. “A Model of Science Kinematics”. Studia Logica 52. 1993: 519-548. Print.
Balzer, Wolfgang and Carlos Ulises Moulines. Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1966. Print.
Balzer, Wolfgang, Carlos Ulises Moulines and Joseph D. Sneed An Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987. Print.
Balzer, W., Joseph D. Sneed and Carlos Ulises Moulines Structuralist knowledge Representation. Paradigmatic Examples. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi, 2000. Print.
Díez, José A. y Carlos Ulises Moulines. Fundamentos de filosofía de ciencia. Barcelona, Ariel, 1997. Impreso.
Gädhe, Ulrich. “A Formal Approach to the Theory-Dependent Measurement”. Philosophia Naturalis 21, 1984: 266-272. Print.
---. “Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms”. Erkenntnis 32, 1990: 215-233. Print.
---. “Holism and the Empirical Claim of Theory-Nets”. Eds. Balzer, W. and C.U. Moulines. Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996: 167-190. Print.
---. “Holism, Underdetermination, and the Dynamic or Empirical Theories”. Synthese 130. 2002: 69-90. Print.
Kamlah, A. “An Improved Definition of ´Theoretical in a Given Theory. Erkenntnis, 10. 1976: 349-359. Print.
Kuhn, Thomas Samuel. “Postscript-1969”. In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: U. of Chicago P.2ª ed. aumentada, 1970: 174-210. Print.
Lorenzano, Pablo. “Base empírica global de contrastación, base empírica local de contrastacion”. Agora 31, 2. 2012: 71-107. Impreso.
Moulines, Carlos Ulises. Exploraciones metacientíficas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1982. Impreso.
---. “Chapter 1: Structuralism: The Basic Ideas”. Eds. Balzer W. and C.U. Moulines. 1966. Print.
---. “The basic core of simple equilibrium thermodinamics”. Eds. Balzer W. and C.U. Moulines. 2000: 307-332. Print.
---. “Models of Data, Theoretical Models, and Ontology. A Structuralist Perspective”. Eds. Hoffmann, M., J. Lenhard, and J.F. Seeger. Activity and Sign, New York: Springer, 2005: 325-333. Print.
---. “Explicación teórica y compromisos ontológicos: un modelo estructuralista. Enrahonar 37. 2005: 45-53. Print.
Sneed, Joseph D. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 2ª. ed. revisada, 1979. Print.
Suppes, P. “A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences”. Synthese 12, 1960: 287-301. Print.
Suppes. P. (1962). “Models of Data”. Eds. Nagel, E., P. Suppes, and A. Tarski. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proccedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford: Stanford U. P., 1962: . 252-261. Print.
Suppes, Patrick. “La estructura de las teorías y el análisis de datos”. Ed. P. Suppes.Estudios de Filosofía y Metodología de la Ciencia, Madrid: Alianza, 1988: 125-145. Print.
Tuomela, R. Theoretical Concepts. Wien-New York: Springer, 1973. Print.
Woodward, Jim. “Data, phenomena, and reliability. Philosophy of Science, Supplement 67. Sept., 2000: 47-76. Print.
