PDF
FLIP
Fecha Publicación: 2011-01-01
Cómo citar
Miller, D. (2011). Verdades antiguas y modernas. Discusiones Filosóficas, 12(18), 207–227. Recuperado a partir de https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/715
Más formatos de cita
Autores/as
Resumen
Este artículo presenta una comparación de las teorías de verdad, y las soluciones a la paradoja del mentiroso, propuestas por Tomas Bradwardino (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), y Alfred Tarski (1901–1983). Además realiza una breve crítica a la posición expuesta por Read en su artículo: The liar and the new T-schema.
Palabras clave:
Citas
Bellhouse, D. R. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations”. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 68, 2000. 123-136. Print.
Black, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949. Print.
Boyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Nueva Iorque: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reimprimido 1959. Nueva Iorque: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949. Print.
Goldstein, L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, 1986. 117-121. Print.
- - -. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 65-85. Print.
Grant, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 1965. 344-364. Print.
Miller, D. W. Reseña de Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot. Philosophy 85, 3, 2008. 433-436. Print.
Mills, E. “Scheming and Lying”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 113–128. Print.
Mou, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and Its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 2001. 91–122. Print.
Panaccio, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 229–253. Print.
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, 1951. 20-43. Reprinted. From A Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46. Print.
Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008. Print.
Read, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008a. 3-17. Print.
- - -. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008b. 205-225. Print.
- - -. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Paris, Lovaina, Walpole MA: Peeters, 2010. Print.
Restall, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 135–147. Print.
Sandu, G. “Read on the Liar”. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. Eds. Pihlström, S., Raatikainen, P. and Sintonen, M. Londres: College Publications. 2007. 129–140. Print.
Spade, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, 1981. 115–134. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Reprinted as chapter IV of P. V. Spade, 1988. Londres: Variorum Reprints.
Tarski, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 1935–1936. 503–526, and 26. 2. 283–301. Las referencias son a la traducción inglesa. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, capítulo XII, 1956. 342–383. Print.
________. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944. 341-375. Print.
_________. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956. Print.
Wright, C.J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Print.
Black, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949. Print.
Boyer, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. Nueva Iorque: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reimprimido 1959. Nueva Iorque: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949. Print.
Goldstein, L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, 1986. 117-121. Print.
- - -. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 65-85. Print.
Grant, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, 1965. 344-364. Print.
Miller, D. W. Reseña de Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot. Philosophy 85, 3, 2008. 433-436. Print.
Mills, E. “Scheming and Lying”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 113–128. Print.
Mou, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and Its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 2001. 91–122. Print.
Panaccio, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 229–253. Print.
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, 1951. 20-43. Reprinted. From A Logical Point of View. W. V. O. Quine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 20-46. Print.
Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., and Genot, E. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008. Print.
Read, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008a. 3-17. Print.
- - -. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008b. 205-225. Print.
- - -. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Paris, Lovaina, Walpole MA: Peeters, 2010. Print.
Restall, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. Rahman, Tulenheimo, & Genot, 2008. 135–147. Print.
Sandu, G. “Read on the Liar”. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. Eds. Pihlström, S., Raatikainen, P. and Sintonen, M. Londres: College Publications. 2007. 129–140. Print.
Spade, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, 1981. 115–134. Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. Reprinted as chapter IV of P. V. Spade, 1988. Londres: Variorum Reprints.
Tarski, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 1935–1936. 503–526, and 26. 2. 283–301. Las referencias son a la traducción inglesa. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, capítulo XII, 1956. 342–383. Print.
________. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944. 341-375. Print.
_________. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956. Print.
Wright, C.J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. Print.
