pdf
FLIP
Cómo citar
Briceño Domínguez, S. . (2016). El sujeto del cambio. Discusiones Filosóficas, 17(29), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.29.2
Más formatos de cita
Autores/as
Resumen
Al enfrentar el problema de los intrínsecos temporales, las posiciones dominantes asumen que el sujeto del cambio es un particular concreto, i.e., un objeto que instancia propiedades intrínsecas en una posición temporal determinada. Posiciones minoritarias niegan la existencia del sujeto del cambio o aceptan a este último como un particular concreto de carácter contradictorio. En este artículo argumento (i) que las soluciones en oferta son incapaces de hacer sentido de las cambiantes apariencias; (ii) que esta incapacidad radica precisamente en una deficiente comprensión del sujeto del cambio; y (iii) que una comprensión del sujeto del cambio basada en un esquema categorial más tolerante sí nos permite hacer mejor sentido de ellas. Bajo este esquema, de raíces idealistas, el sujeto del cambio debe ser entendido como un “universal concreto”.
Palabras clave:
Citas
Armstrong, David M. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: University Press, 1997. Impreso.
Armstrong, David. Universals and Scientific Realism, vols. I y II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. Impreso.
Barker, Stephen. Flux: The Emergence of Time and Modality in a Metaphysically Dynamic Universe. The University of Nottingham, mayo 2016. Borrador inédito.
Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. New York: Dover, 1998. Impreso.
Bradley, Francis H. Appearance and Reality. 2a ed., 9a imp. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930. Impreso.
Briceño, Sebastián. “El regreso de Bradley y el problema de la unidadcompleja: ¿tropos al rescate?”. Crítica. 48 (143). 2016: 47-75. Impreso.
Brower, Jeffrey. “Aristotelian endurantism: a new solution to the problem of temporary intrinsics”. Mind. 119 (476). 2010: 883-905. Impreso.
Carmichael, Chad. “Deep Platonism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 91 (3). 2016: 307-328. Impreso.
Geach, Peter. God and the Soul. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969. Impreso.
Hartshorne, Charles. Creative Synthesis and Philosophical Method. La Salle: Open Court, 1970. Impreso.
Hegel, Georg W. F. The Science of Logic. Trad. George di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Impreso.
Johnston, Mark. “Is there a problem about persistence?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 61. 1987: 107-135. Impreso.
Lewis, David. “Tensing the copula”. Mind. 111 (441). 2002: 1-14. Impreso.
Lewis, David. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. Impreso.
Loux, Michael. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2006. Impreso.
Markosian, Ned. “A defense of presentism”. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 1. Dean Zimmerman (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 47-82. Impreso.
Mellor, David. Real Time II. New York: Routledge, 1998. Impreso.
Moore, George E. “External and internal relations”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series. 20. 1919: 40-62. Impreso.
Priest, Graham. In Contradiction. 2a ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Impreso.
Quine, Willard V. O. “Identity, ostension, and hypostasis”. The Journal of Philosophy. 47 (22). 1950: 621-633. Impreso.
Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996. Impreso.
Rorty, Richard. “Relations, external and internal.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7. Paul Edwards (Ed.). New York: Macmillan Company, 1967. 125-133. Impreso.
Sanford, David. “Determinates vs. determinables”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). En http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/determinatedeterminables Web. 14 sep. 2016.
Seibt, Johanna. “Beyond endurance and perdurance: recurrent dynamics”. Persistence. Christian Kanzian (Ed.). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008. 133-164. Impreso.
Sellars, Wilfrid. “Foundations for a metaphysics of pure process”. The Monist. 64 (1). 1981: 3-90. Impreso.
Sider, Theodore. Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Impreso.
Simons, Peter. “Particulars in particular clothing: three trope theories of substance”. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research. 54 (3). 1994: 553-575. Impreso.
Smart, John J. C. “The river of time”. Mind, New Series. 58 (232). 1949: 483-494. Impreso.
Stern, Robert. “Hegel, British idealism, and the curious case of the concrete universal”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 15 (1). 2007: 115-153. Impreso.
van Fraassen, Bas. Scientific Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Impreso.
van Inwagen, Peter. “Four-dimensional objects”. Noûs. 24 (2). 1990: 245-255. Impreso.
Whitehead, Alfred N. Process and Reality. David R. Griffin y Donald W. Sherburne (eds.). New York: The Free Press, 1978. Impreso.
Wiggins, David. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Impreso.
Williams, Donald C. “The myth of passage”. The Journal of Philosophy. 48 (15). 1951: 457-472. Impreso.
Zimmerman, Dean. “Persistence and presentism”. Philosophical Papers. 25 (2). 1996: 115–126. Impreso.
Zimmerman, Dean. “Temporary intrinsics and presentism”. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Peter van Inwagen y Dean Zimmerman (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. 206–221. Impreso.
Armstrong, David. Universals and Scientific Realism, vols. I y II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. Impreso.
Barker, Stephen. Flux: The Emergence of Time and Modality in a Metaphysically Dynamic Universe. The University of Nottingham, mayo 2016. Borrador inédito.
Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. New York: Dover, 1998. Impreso.
Bradley, Francis H. Appearance and Reality. 2a ed., 9a imp. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930. Impreso.
Briceño, Sebastián. “El regreso de Bradley y el problema de la unidadcompleja: ¿tropos al rescate?”. Crítica. 48 (143). 2016: 47-75. Impreso.
Brower, Jeffrey. “Aristotelian endurantism: a new solution to the problem of temporary intrinsics”. Mind. 119 (476). 2010: 883-905. Impreso.
Carmichael, Chad. “Deep Platonism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 91 (3). 2016: 307-328. Impreso.
Geach, Peter. God and the Soul. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969. Impreso.
Hartshorne, Charles. Creative Synthesis and Philosophical Method. La Salle: Open Court, 1970. Impreso.
Hegel, Georg W. F. The Science of Logic. Trad. George di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Impreso.
Johnston, Mark. “Is there a problem about persistence?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 61. 1987: 107-135. Impreso.
Lewis, David. “Tensing the copula”. Mind. 111 (441). 2002: 1-14. Impreso.
Lewis, David. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. Impreso.
Loux, Michael. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2006. Impreso.
Markosian, Ned. “A defense of presentism”. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 1. Dean Zimmerman (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 47-82. Impreso.
Mellor, David. Real Time II. New York: Routledge, 1998. Impreso.
Moore, George E. “External and internal relations”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series. 20. 1919: 40-62. Impreso.
Priest, Graham. In Contradiction. 2a ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Impreso.
Quine, Willard V. O. “Identity, ostension, and hypostasis”. The Journal of Philosophy. 47 (22). 1950: 621-633. Impreso.
Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996. Impreso.
Rorty, Richard. “Relations, external and internal.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7. Paul Edwards (Ed.). New York: Macmillan Company, 1967. 125-133. Impreso.
Sanford, David. “Determinates vs. determinables”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). En http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/determinatedeterminables Web. 14 sep. 2016.
Seibt, Johanna. “Beyond endurance and perdurance: recurrent dynamics”. Persistence. Christian Kanzian (Ed.). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008. 133-164. Impreso.
Sellars, Wilfrid. “Foundations for a metaphysics of pure process”. The Monist. 64 (1). 1981: 3-90. Impreso.
Sider, Theodore. Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Impreso.
Simons, Peter. “Particulars in particular clothing: three trope theories of substance”. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research. 54 (3). 1994: 553-575. Impreso.
Smart, John J. C. “The river of time”. Mind, New Series. 58 (232). 1949: 483-494. Impreso.
Stern, Robert. “Hegel, British idealism, and the curious case of the concrete universal”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 15 (1). 2007: 115-153. Impreso.
van Fraassen, Bas. Scientific Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Impreso.
van Inwagen, Peter. “Four-dimensional objects”. Noûs. 24 (2). 1990: 245-255. Impreso.
Whitehead, Alfred N. Process and Reality. David R. Griffin y Donald W. Sherburne (eds.). New York: The Free Press, 1978. Impreso.
Wiggins, David. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Impreso.
Williams, Donald C. “The myth of passage”. The Journal of Philosophy. 48 (15). 1951: 457-472. Impreso.
Zimmerman, Dean. “Persistence and presentism”. Philosophical Papers. 25 (2). 1996: 115–126. Impreso.
Zimmerman, Dean. “Temporary intrinsics and presentism”. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Peter van Inwagen y Dean Zimmerman (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. 206–221. Impreso.
