DOI: 10.17151/culdr.2025.30.39.5
How to Cite
Tirado-Otálvaro, A. F., Gómez-Vargas, M., & Velásquez-Carvajal, D. (2025). "The meaning of pleasure in recreational drug users’ (decision analysis and utilitarianism). Cultura Y Droga, 30(39), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.17151/culdr.2025.30.39.5

Authors

Andrés Felipe Tirado-Otálvaro
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana 
felipe.tirado@upb.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-1494
Perfil Google Scholar
Maricelly Gómez-Vargas
Universidad de Antioquia 
maricelly.gomez@udea.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-7821
Perfil Google Scholar
David Velásquez-Carvajal
Corporación Universitaria Remington 
david.velasquez@uniremington.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-8622
Perfil Google Scholar

Abstract

Individual decision-making is a complex process influenced by psychological and philosophical factors. Hedonic psychology plays a crucial role in understanding how pleasure and pain impact choices. This field focuses on maximising pleasure and minimising pain, and is closely related to utilitarianism — an ethical theory that seeks to maximise happiness for the greatest number of people. Both approaches address concepts such as anticipated, experienced, remembered and decision utility, and their interplay can lead to decisions that, while rational from hedonic and utilitarian perspectives, can have unexpected or counterproductive consequences, as observed in substance use. Anticipated utility refers to expectations of future satisfaction, while experienced utility is the actual impact of a reward. Remembered utility is the recollection of past rewards, which can be distorted and affect future expectations. These concepts are intertwined in the decision-making process, where discrepancies between anticipated and experienced utility can lead to erroneous decisions. Furthermore, utilitarianism differs from Kantian ethics in that it values the consequences of actions in order to maximise overall happiness. Drug consumption illustrates how expectations can differ from actual experiences, leading to irrational decisions based on an overestimation of anticipated utility. Hedonic psychology and utilitarianism provide valuable insights into such decisions and could inform public health policies better by considering both subjective experiences and objective factors that influence substance use.

Álvarez, M. L., Gómez G, L. M., Velásquez T, J. D., Ramírez P, C., Tirado O, A. F. y Vargas G, A. R. (2010). Diagnóstico, tratamiento e intervención de las personas consumidoras de drogas. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.

American Psychiatric Association & American Psychiatric Association (Eds.). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. (5th ed). American Psychiatric Association.

Barrondo Lakarra, S., López de Jesús, M. y Meana Martínez, J. (2006). Bases biológicas, psicológicas y socioculturales. En Tratado S.E.T. de trastornos adictivos (pp. 1-13). Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Berridge, K. C., & Aldridge, J. W. (2008). Decision utility, the brain, and pursuit of hedonic goals. Social Cognition, 26(5), 621-646. https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2008.26.5.621

Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2011). Building a neuroscience of pleasure and well-being. Psychology of Well-Being, 1(1), 1-26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2211-1522-1-3

Brocas, I., & Carrillo, J. D. (2004). The psychology of economic decisions. Oxford University Press.

Caponi, S. (1997). Georges Canguilhem and the epistemological status of the concept of health. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 4(2), 287-307. https://www.scielo.br/j/ hcsm/a/spm8DWcdrjMsdX9JQKrYt7N/abstract/?format=html&lang=en

Carabaña, J. y Lamo de Espinosa, E. (1978). La teoría social del interaccionismo simbólico: Análisis y valoración crítica. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas REIS,(1), 159-205.

Del Moral, M. y Lorenzo Fernández, P. (2009). Fundamentos psicosociales de las drogodependencias: Prevención y tratamiento. En P. Lorenzo, J. M. Ladero, J. C. Leza y I.Lizasoain (eds.), Drogodependencias: Farmacología, patología, psicología, legislación (pp. 27-62). Editorial. Médica Panamericana.

Diana, M. (2011). The dopamine hypothesis of drug addiction and its potential therapeutic value. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00064

Henriquez, P. C. y Carvalho, A. M. P. de. (2008). Percepción de los beneficios del consumo de drogas y barreras para su abandono entre estudiantes del área de salud. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 16, 621-626. https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/SqDLkGjjtBwH
dxpPkCnjjfL/?format=pdf&lang=es

Herman, M. A., & Roberto, M. (2015). The addicted brain: Understanding the neurophysiological mechanisms of addictive disorders. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnint.2015.00018/full

Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Random House Mondadori.

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (2003). Well-Being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375-406. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/112/2/375/1870917

Kant, I. (2002). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres (S. Vucetich, Trad.).Losada. (Obra original publicada en 1785)

Kringelbach, M. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2010). The neuroscience of happiness and pleasure. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 77(2), 659-678. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/528043/summary

Mauish, M. E. (2004). The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: General considerations. (3th. ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Maureira, F. (2009). Comparación de las características neurales y conductuales. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología, 4(2), 84-90. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1793/179314913002.pdf

Mill, J. S. (1997). Sobre la libertad. Alianza Editorial.

Mill, J. S. (2002). El utilitarismo: Un sistema de la lógica. Alianza Editorial.

Nichols, D. E. (2016). Psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews, 68(2), 264-355. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011478

Passie, T., Halpern, J. H., Stichtenoth, D. O., Emrich, H. M., & Hintzen, A. (2008). The Pharmacology of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide: A Review. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 14(4), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2008.00059.x

Ramos, J. A. y Fernández, J. (2009). Mecanismos neuroquímicos de las drogodependencias. En P. Lorenzo, J. M. Ladero, J. C. Leza y I Lizasoain (eds.), Drogodependencias: Farmacología, patología, psicología, legislación (pp. 63-75). Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2003). Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145237

Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1507), 3137-3146. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/
rstb.2008.0093

Sandel, M. J. (2011). Justicia. Random House Mondadori.

Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Editorial Planeta.

Tirado-Otálvaro, A. F. (2016). El consumo de drogas en el debate de la salud pública, Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 32(17). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00177215

Trujillo, Ä. M., Forns, M. y Pérez, A. (2007). Uso de sustancias y percepción de riesgo: Estudio comparativo entre jóvenes de Bogotá y Barcelona. Adicciones, 19(2), 179-190. https://www.adicciones.es/index.php/adicciones/article/view/315

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref

Scopus

Europe PMC
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |