How to Cite
Apráez Guerrero, . J. E. ., Fernández Pármo, L. ., & Hernández González, A. . (2011). Evaluation of different forms of presentation of Guinea pig meat (Cavia porcellus). Revista Veterinaria Y Zootecnia (On Line), 5(2), 24–29. Retrieved from https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/4453

Authors

José Edmundo Apráez Guerrero
eapraez@udenar.edu.co
Lissette Fernández Pármo
sincorreo@ucaldas.edu.co
Alejandro Hernández González
sincorreo@ucaldas.edu.co

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Guinea pigs from both sexes were used in the development of this investigation which were slaughtered at 12 weeks of age. The fresh carcases were slaughtered responding to 7 presentations: complete with head, complete without head, cut on strips, cut in quarters, boned, ground meat and live animals.  Subsequently, a survey was conducted among 60 people who consumed seven samples corresponding to each one of the treatments. In general consumers preferred slaughtered animals since they considered it too complicated to have to slaughter the animal at home. As far as sausage products are concerned, mortadella and sausage were prepared following the original recipes which became the control. Guinea pig meat was used instead of beef and partially instead of textured soy in order to  originate two new products: guinea pig mortadella and guinea pig sausage. It was found that the replacement of beef for guinea pig meat in the making of sausage improved the production acceptance in 21.67%. The statistical analysis showed significant differences for the “I like it a lot” categories, where the highest values were for guinea pig sausage; on the other hand, the “I dislike it a lot”, “I dislike it very much” and “complete rejection” categories, were for beef sausage, thus corroborating the superior acceptance of the guinea pig product.

Caicedo, A. Aspectos de investigación en nutrición de cuyes e Industrialización de su carne. Congreso Latinoamericano de Cuyicultura, Ecuador, 1993. Memorias. p.125-135.

________. Avances en la producción técnica de cuyes. Pasto, Colombia: Universidad de Nariño, 2000. 112p.

Chauca, L. Producción de cuyes (Cavia porcellus). Estudio FAO producción y Sanidad animal 138, 1997. 77p.

Codex Alimentario. Guía de Interpretación de Resultados Microbiológicos de Alimentos. Disponible en: http://www.anmat.gov.ar/ alimentos/Guia_de_interpretacion_resultados_ microbiologicos.pdfDuncan, B. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics, 11, 1955.

Moncayo, R. Avances técnicos en la producción comercial de cuyes. Seminario taller sobre nuevos avances de la Cuyicultura en Latinoamérica. Memorias. Universidad Mayor de San Simón. Proyecto Mejocuy, 1997. p.91- 98.

Torricella, R.; Zamora, E.; Pulido, H. Evaluación Sensorial en la Industria Alimentaria. Cuba: Centro de Información y Documentación Científico-Técnica IIIA - Minal Edit., 1989. 206p.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |