Especificidades de la conciliación extrajudicial en Colombia en relación con las partes implicadas

Abstract

Extrajudicial conciliation in Colombia as a conflict resolution mechanism presents special characteristics with respect to the parties that may participate in it as a direct result of the application of legal-procedural rules. The purpose of this research is to determine, through the methodology of critical analysis, bibliographic and documentary review, which of the procedural figures that have direct or indirect participation in the judicial process, meet the requirements of a party to act in the conciliation hearing. It is concluded that the appearance of the parties in conflict to the conciliation procedure is mandatory, but that the hearing may also be attended by the attorneys-in-fact and those called as guarantors. However, the informal agent has limited powers in the procedure, since it lacks the necessary powers to endorse its actions in the conciliation hearing.

Keywords:

conciliación extrajudicial

MASC

conciliación

partes

derecho procesal

out-of-court conciliation

conciliation

parties

procedural law

MASC

References

Arboleda López, A. P., Ramírez Arango, C., Mancipe Vanegas, G. S., Garcés Giraldo, L. F., & Arboleda Cardona, S. (2018). The extrajudicial virtual conciliation in Law; reflections on ethics. Justicia,23(34), 372-384. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.23.34.2897

Arrieta-López, M. (2022). Evolution of the human right to peace in the framework of the United Nations and Civil Society Organizations. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 519–554. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.21

Arrieta-López, M., & Carrasquilla-Díaz, L.P. (2021). Bullying and Cyberbullying: A Legal and Public Policy Perspective in Colombia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 29(4), 2135-2151. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.02

Arrieta-López, M. & Meza-Godoy, A. (2019). Effectiveness of the function of concretization of the maintenance obligation of the family defenders in the city of Barranquilla between 2015 and 2017.Jurídicas, 16(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2019.16.2.10

Arrieta-López, M., Meza-Godoy, A., Afanasiev, I. V., Sekerin, V. D., & Noli, S. (2021). Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Colombia and Russia: Conciliation and Mediation. Justicia, 26(40), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.26.40.4773

Azula, J. (2016). Manual de Derecho Procesal [Manual of Procedural Law], Vol. 1. Temis.

Bejarano, R. (2019). Procesos Declarativos, Arbitrales y Ejecutivos [Declaratory, Arbitration and Enforcement Proceedings]. Temis.

Colombia. Ministry of Interior and Justice. (2004, September 22). Concept No. 12919. https://www.redjurista.com/Documents/concepto_12919_de_2004_ministerio_del_interior_y_de_justicia.aspx

Cuesta-Cuesta, D. M. (2015). La conciliación en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano. Una nueva forma de enseñar Derecho [Conciliation in the Colombian legal system. A new way of teaching law].Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. https://doi.org/10.16925/greylit.1443

Díaz, J. C. (2010). El agente oficioso. Temas Socio-Jurídicos, 26(55). Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/sociojuridico/article/view/975

Díaz, J. C. (2020). Reflections on the principles of celerity, impartiality and efficiency in the General Code of the Process. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 407-444. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.18

Executive Order 491. (2020, March 28). https://dapre.presidencia.gov.co/normativa/normativa/Decreto-491-28-marzo-2020.pdf

Hernández García de Velazco, J. J., Ravina Ripoll, R., Chumaceiro Hernández, A.C. (2020). Relevance and social responsibility of sustainable university organizations: analysis from the perspective ofv endogenous capacities. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2967-2977. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(26)

Law 270 (1996, March 15). Congress of the Republic of Colombia. Official journal no. 42.745. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0270_1996.html

Law 640 (2001, January 5). Congress of the Republic of Colombia. Official journal no. 44.303. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0640_2001.html

Law 1564 (2012, July 12). Congress of the Republic of Colombia. Official journal no. 48.489. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012.html

Law 1996 (2019, August 26). Congress of the Republic of Colombia. Official journal no. 51.057. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1996_2019.html

Law 2220 (2022, February 8). Congress of the Republic of Colombia. Official journal no. 51.942. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_2200_2022.html

Meza-Godoy, A., Arrieta-López, M., & Carrasquilla-Díaz, L. (2021). Analysis of parties, representatives, and limits of the officious intermeddler in the extrajudicial conciliation in Colombia. Revista Republicana, (31), 191-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v31.a113

Meza-Godoy, A., Arrieta-López, M. & Noli, S. (2018). Analysis of civil extrajudicial conciliation in the Colombian Atlantic Coast. Jurídicas CUC,14(1), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.14.1.2018.09

Mojica Cortés, F. P. (2009). Analysis of the structure of the claims and exceptions as essential elements of the process and the judicial sentence. Revista Republicana, (7), 153-170. http://ojs.urepublicana.edu.co/index.php/revistarepublicana/article/view/100

Navarro-Hernández, J. L. (2022). Analysis of judicial control prior to actions that limit the fundamental right to privacy in Colombia. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 279–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.12

Narváez Mercado, B., & Castilla Paba, F. (2022). Arbitration as an effective tool for conflict resolution in Colombia. Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.01

Paz Russi, C. A. (2015). Estudio Doctrinal y Jurisprudencial del Proceso Civil. Ecoe.

Peña-Sandoval, H. (2017). Mediation is not Justice. Pensamiento Jurídico, 0(45), 241-267. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/peju/article/view/65676

Political Constitution of Colombia. (1991, July 20). Constituent Assembly of Colombia. Constitutional gazette no. 116. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/constitucion_politica_1991.html

Rodríguez-Serpa, F. A., Navarro Beltrán, J. A., De la Torre-Soto, G. L., Andrade Saavedra, A. R., & Torres Hernández, O. (2023). Public ethics as a criterion of legitimate trust in judicial decisions of the Colombian Constitutional Court). Jurídicas CUC, 19(1), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.19.1.2023.08

Ruling C-902 (2008, September 17). Constitutional Court of the Republic of Colombia. (Nilson Pinilla, RP). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2008/C-902-08.htm

Ruling C-1195 (2001, November 15). Constitutional Court of the Republic of Colombia. (Manuel Cepeda, Marco Monroy, RP). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2001/c-1195-01.htm

Ruling T-044 (1996, February 7). Constitutional Court of the Republic of Colombia. (José Hernández, RP). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/t-044-96.htm

Tamayo Lombana, A. (2004). Manual de Obligaciones. 6th Edition. Temis.

Tamez González, G., Montalvo Herrera, D. J., Leiva Cordero, O., & Hernández Paz, A. (2018). Comparative analysis on the alternative methods for the solution of conflicts based on the legislation of the States of the Mexican Republic. Justicia, 24(34), 385-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/just.23.34.2899