Authors
Abstract
There is a judicial concern regarding the possibility of the existence of an only correct answer in several current law philosophers and theorists, such as Aulis Aarnio, with his text, One right answer?. His postures will be analyzed in relation to those taken by Nino, Habermas, Perelman, Dworkin, Alexy, MacCormick and Peczenick, in order to establish their agreements and counter-positions. Additionally, a synthesis of the contemporary doctrine on the judicial argumentation will be carried out, comparing and submitting Aarnio’s thesis to its differences, with the purpose of making evident its great impact in this field of iusphilosophical research.