DOI: 10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.9
How to Cite
Toro-Duque, E. M. (2025). The importance of speech act theory in legal language. Jurídicas, 22(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2025.22.2.9

Authors

Eliana María Toro-Duque
Magistrada de la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Manizales 
elianatoroduque@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0402-1815

Abstract

It served as the basis for the present investigation; the tension that arose between the Supreme Court of Justice (CSJ) and the Constitutional Court of Colombia (The Court) as a result of the entry into force of the Political Constitution of 1991, the prevalence that it has in the legal system, and above all, the core function that the Court has to safeguard the fundamental rights of citizens. Through this text, it is intended to show, based on experience and theoretical analysis, that the philosophy of language provides the method applied by the Constitutional Court of Colombia, to resolve the tensions between its illocutionary speech acts and those issued by the Supreme Court of Justice in the fulfillment of its function as guardian of the constitution. The methodology is exploratory; the foundations of the theories of some of the most representative philosophers of language have been analyzed, finding in theory coined by Austin and endorsed by Searle the best source to respond to the concern raised; likewise, a search has been made of the sentences of the Constitutional Court of Colombia in which the High Court based itself on the issue of language to solve the problems put under their consideration. When analyzing these sentences, it was possible to show that the philosophy of language provides adequate tools for analyzing legal language to the Court. In some cases, even its rulings have as their source what the philosophers of the language studied in our investigation stated.

Assimakopoulos, S. (2025). Speech act theory. Cambridge University Press.

Austin, J. L. (2009). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Planeta.

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communications speech acts. MIT Press.

Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1971). Código de Comercio (Decreto 410 de 1971), art. 1058. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=41102

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (5 de agosto de 2003). Sentencia C-651 de 2003. [M. P. Rodrigo Escobar Gil]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/C-651-03.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (3 de noviembre de 2004). Sentencia C-1088 de 2004. [M. P. Jaime Córdoba Triviño]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2004/C-1088-04.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (24 de mayo de 2005). Sentencia C-534 de 2005. [M. P. Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/C-534-05.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (27 de septiembre de 2006). Sentencia C-804 de 2006. [M. P. Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2006/C-804-06.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (7 de febrero de 2007). Sentencia C-078 de 2007. [M. P. Jaime Córdoba Triviño]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2007/C-078-07.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (24 de agosto 24 de 2011). Sentencia C-634 de 2011. [M. P. Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/C-634-11.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1 de agosto de 2012). Sentencia C-605 de 2012. [M. P. María Victoria Calle Correa]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2012/c-605-12.htm

Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (11 de febrero de 2013). Sentencia C-066 de 2013. [M. P. Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2013/C-066-13.htm

Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Hermenéutica de la modernidad: conversaciones con Silvio Vietta. Trotta.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntas and semantics. VOL 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.

Olivercrona, K. (2013). Lenguaje jurídico y realidad. Universidad Autónoma de México.

Patiño-Arango, A. (2015). Como hacer el derecho con palabras. Jurídicas, 12(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2015.12.1.5

Portner, P. (2004). The semanties of imperatives coithin a theory of clause types. En K. Watanabe y R. B.Young (Eds.), Procedings of SALT 14 (pp.235-252). CLC Publications.

Ross, A. (1951). Tû-Tû. Harvard Law Review, 70(5), 812-825.

Searle, J. (2017). Actos de habla. Cátedra.

Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73(4), 439-460. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183301?utm

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Europe PMC
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |