Authors
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency in the quality of Health Promotion Entities service of the subsidized regime between 2011-1 and 2014-1. Materials and Methods: A descriptive retrospective study of the quality in the subsidized regime health promotion entities service was performed supported by the data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology using the output-oriented model proposed by Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes. A selection of a set of variables was performed from the database of the National Health Board. Results: The results indicate that 14 of the 22 evaluated entities showed efficiency greater than 90% during the study period. Conclusions: The envelopment analysis of data allowed identifying the subsidized regime Health Promotion Entities (EPS) that obtained a good performance in the period of study, as well as the average efficiency that did not exceed 70%, which shows that Colombia is currently undergoing a crisis in the health sector.
Keywords:
References
2. Mpinganjira M. Una investigación de la percepción de la calidad de servicio de compras en línea: un enfoque jerárquico. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 2014; 31(1): 115-130.
3. García-Subirats I, Vargas I, Mogollón-Pérez A, De Paepe P, Ferreira da Silva M, Unger J, Vásquez M. Determinantes del uso de distintos niveles asistenciales en el Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud y Sistema Único de Salud en Colombia y Brasil. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2014; 28 (6): 480-488.
4. Rodríguez R, Infante A. La atención universal de la salud para los colombianos de 10 años después de la Ley 100: desafíos y oportunidades. La política de salud. 2004; 68(2): 129-142.
5. Vargas-Zea N, Castro H, Rodríguez F, Téllez D, Salazar-Arias R. Colombian health system on its way to improve allocation efficiency-transition from a health sector reform to the settlement of an HTA agency. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2012; 1(2):218-222.
6. Machado-Alba J, Torres D, Portilla A, Ruiz A. Results of the Inclusion of New Medications in the Obligatory Health System Plan in Colombia, 2012-2013. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2015; 8: 28-35.
7. Ministerio de la Protección Social. Monitoreo al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud. [Internet]; 2010. [Acceso 7 abril de 2015]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.minsalud.gov.co/Documentos%20y%20Publicaciones/BOLETIN%20SALUD.pdf .
8. Pulido H, González P, López C, Caldera L. Análisis multivariado y QFD como herramientas para escuchar la voz del cliente y mejorar la calidad del servicio. Ingeniare: Revista Chilena de Ingeniería. 2014; 22(1): 62-73.
9. Delgado M, Vásquez M, De Moraes-Vanderlei L. Calidad en los servicios de salud desde los marcos de sentido de diferentes actores sociales en Colombia y Brasil. Revista de Salud Pública. 2010; 12(4): 533-545.
10. Castañeda G, Delgado M. Barreras, oportunidades y tácticas para participar en salud según asociaciones de usuarios del Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud. 2015; 20(2): 59-76.
11. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Salud y Derechos humanos. [Internet]; 2013. [Acceso 17 abril de 2015]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs323/es/
12. Gupta U, Sibal A, Sharma A. Promoting Quality in Healthcare: Performance Management. Apollo medicina. 2005; 2(3): 255-257.
13. Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications. 2012; 39(3): 2341-2354.
14. Koornneef E, Robben P, Al Seiari M, Al Siksek Z. Health system reform in the emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Health policy. 2012; 108(2):115-121.
15. Fairbrother G, Simpson L. Measuring and reporting quality of health care for children: CHIPRA and beyond. Academic pediatrics. 2011; 11(3): S77-S84.
16. Chung K, Shauver M. Measuring quality in health care and its implications for pay-for-performance initiatives. Hand clinics. 2009; 25(1): 71-81.
17. Stelfox H, Straus S. Measuring quality of care: considering measurement frameworks and needs assessment to guide quality indicator development. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2013; 66(12): 1320-1327.
18. Handayani P, Hidayanto A, Sandhyaduhita P, Ayuningtyas D. Strategic hospital services quality analysis in Indonesia. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015; 42(6): 3067-3078.
19. Purcărea V, Gheorghe I, Petrescu C. The assessment of perceived service quality of public health care services in Romania using the SERVQUAL scale. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2013; 6: 573-585.
20. Hernández J, Rubiano D, Barona J. Barreras de acceso administrativo a los servicios de salud en población colombiana, 2013. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2015; 20(6): 1947-1958.
21. Losada-Otálora M, Rodríguez-Orejuela A. Calidad del servicio de salud: una revisión a la literatura desde la perspectiva del marketing. Cuadernos de Administración. 2007; 20(34): 237-258.
22. Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978; 2(6): 429-444.
23. Subhash Ray. Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data. Management Science. 1991; 37(12): 1620-1628.
24. La Plante A, Paradi C. Evaluation of bank branch growth potential using data envelopment analysis. Omega. 2015; 52: 33-41.
25. Tsolas I, Giokas I. Bank branch efficiency evaluation by means of least absolute deviations and DEA. Managerial finance. 2012; 38(8): 768-785.
26. Anayiotos G, Toroyan H, Vamvakidis A. The efficiency of emerging Europe’s banking sector before and after the recent economic crisis. Financial Theory and Practice. 2010; 34(3): 247-267.
27. Ross A, Kuzu K, Li W. Exploring supplier performance risk and the buyer’s role using chanceconstrained data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 2016; 250(3): 966-978.
28. Fan C, Wang X. Supplier evaluation based on synthesis method of principal component analysis, data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Tongji University. Natural Science. 2012; 40(12): 1899-1904.
29. Karsak E, Dursun M. An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014; 41(16): 6995-7004.
30. Popescu C, Asandului L, Fatulescu P. A Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating Romania’s Health System. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 109: 1185-1189
31. Geitona M, Androutsou L, Kotsopoulos N, Gourgoulianis K. Measuring the efficiency among secondary and university pulmonary hospital clinics in Greece. Pneumon. [Internet]. 2014. [Acceso 12 de mayo de 2015]; 1(1): 31-36. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.pneumon.org/902/newsid844/558/linktopdf844/1
32. Hu H, Qi Q, Yang C. Analysis of hospital technical efficiency in China: Effect of health insurance reform. China Economic Review. 2012; 23(4): 865-877.
33. Chowdhury H, Zelenyuk V, Laporte A, Wodchis W. Analysis of productivity, efficiency and technological changes in hospital services in Ontario: How does case-mix matter? International Journal of Production Economics. 2014; 150: 74-82.
34. Cheng G, Zervopoulos PD. Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A crosscountry comparison using the directional distance function. European Journal of Operational Research. 2014; 238(3): 899-910.
35. Martínez-Franco C, Guzmán I. Medida de la eficiencia en entidades no lucrativas: un estudio empírico para fundaciones asistenciales. Revista de Contabilidad. 2014; 17(1): 47-57.
36. Superintendencia de Salud. Circular Única. Bogotá D.C.: El Ministerio, 2006. 595 p.
37. Escobar-Pérez J, Cuervo-Martínez A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en medición. 2008; 6: 27-36.
38. Jenkins L, Anderson M. A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 2003; 147(1): 51-61.
39. Charnes A, Cooper W. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research logistics quarterly. 1962; 9(3-4):181-186.
40. Ortiz G, Navarro-Vargas J, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Inequidad en el sistema de salud: El panorama de la analgesia obstétrica. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología. 2013; 41(3): 215-217.
41. Jaramillo-Mejía M, Chernichovsky D. Información para la calidad del sistema de salud en Colombia: una propuesta de revisión basada en el modelo israelí. Estudios Gerenciales. 2015; 31(134): 30-40.