How to Cite
Gómez Duque, A. M., Castaño Zapata, J., & Ceballos Aguirre, N. (2015). Evaluating cherry tomato type (Solanum spp.) against late blight tomato Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary and root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in two production systems. Agronomía, 23(1), 66–81. Retrieved from https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/agronomia/article/view/21

Authors

Ana María Gómez Duque

Ingeniera agrónoma, Universidad de Caldas

Universidad de Caldas
ana.gomez.duque@gmail.com
Jairo Castaño Zapata

Profesor Titular del Departamento de Producción Agropecuaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Caldas.

Universidad de Caldas
ana.gomez.duque@gmail.com
Nelson Ceballos Aguirre

Profesor Asistente del Departamento de Producción Agropecuaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Caldas.

Universidad de Caldas
ana.gomez.duque@gmail.com

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the most important vegetable in the world. This species is generally affected by parasitic nematodes which are responsible for crop yield losses ranging between 25% and 50%. Similarly, tomato is affected by pathogens such as the Chromista Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) De Bary, known worldwide by the devastating effects it has produced throughout history and its difficulty to control. The resistance of 15 introductions of wild cherry tomato against late blight (P. infestans) tomato and the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) was evaluated in two production systems at the Montelindo farm of Universidad de Caldas using a split-plot experimental design in which the variables evaluated were: Late blight severity and rate of development, index of damage caused by the root-knot nematode and estimated yield (t/ha). The results showed that the introductions evaluated presented susceptibility to both, late blight and root-knot nematode, with average severity of 41,5% for late blight and 8,3% for Meloidogyne spp., equivalent to an average of 30.4 galls per plant. Despite presenting the symptomatology of the diseases evaluated, all the introductions reached production being among the most prominent IAC 421, IAC 1621, IAC 391 and IAC 1688 with yields of 14, 13, 12 and 12 t/ha, respectively.

Anwar, S.A. & Mckenry, M.V. 2012. Incidence and population density of plant-parasitic nematodes infecting vegetable crops and associated yield losses. Pakistan Journal of Phytophathology. 44: 327-333.

Arango, A., Ceballos, N. & Vallejo, F. 2012. Evaluación del contenido de antioxidantes en introducciones de tomate tipo cereza (Solanum spp.). Revista Acta Agronómica. 61 (3): 230-238.

Azevedo, F.J.A. & Melo, A.M.T. 2001. Avaliacao de tomate silvestre do tipo cereja. Horticultura Brasileira. 19 (1): 32-48.

Castaño- Zapata, J. 1989. Estandarización de la estimación de daños causados por hongos, bacterias y nematodos en fríjol. Fitopatología Colombiana. 13 (1): 9-19.

Castaño-Zapata, J. 2002. Principios básicos de fitoepidemiología. Centro editorial Universidad de Caldas, Manizales.

Ceballos, A.N. & Vallejo, F.A. 2012. Evaluación de la producción y calidad del fruto del tomate cereza Solanum lycopersicum var. Cerasiforme. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía. 62 (2): 6593-6604.

Darwin, S.C., Knapp, S. & Peralta, L.E. 2003. Taxonomy of tomatoes in the Galápagos Islands: Native and introduced species of section Solanum Lycopersicon (Solanaceae). Systematics and Biodiversity. 1: 29-5.

FAOSTAT. 2009. Agriculture statistics on crops. Consulta: febrero de 2013. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/X7650S/x7650s17.htm.

Gómez-Duque, A.M., Ceballos-Aguirre, N., Orozco-Castaño, F.J. & Parra, C.A. 2010. Efecto del sistema de producción en semitecho sobre el desarrollo, rendimiento y calidad del tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Agronomía. 18 (2): 47-57.

Herrera, H., Hurtado-Salazar, A. & Ceballos-Aguirre, N. 2015. Estudio técnico y económico del tomate tipo cereza élite (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. Cerasiforme) bajo condiciones semicontroladas. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. 9 (2): 290-300.

Jaiteh, F., Kwoseh, C. & Akromah, R. 2012. Evaluation of tomato genotypes for resistance to root-knot nematodes. National Agricultural Research Institute (NARI). African Crop Science Journal. 20: 41-49.

James, W.C., Callbeck, L.C., Hodgson, W.A. & Shih, C.S. 1971. Evaluation of a method used to estimate loss in yield of potatoes caused by late blight. Phytopathology. 61: 1471-1476.

Jenkins, W.R. & Taylor, D.P. 1967. Plant nematology. Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York.

Kamran, M. et al. 2012. Field evaluation of tomato genotypes for resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 44 (5): 1355-1359.

Macua, J., Lahoz, J., Garnica, S., Calvillo, J. & Santos, A. 2006. Tomate de industria. Navarra Agraria. 154: 21-31.

Márquez, C. & Cano, P. 2005. Producción orgánica de tomate cherry bajo invernadero. Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura. 5 (1): 219-224.

Márquez, C., Cano, P., Moreno, A. & Rodríguez, N. 2006. Sustratos en la producción orgánica de tomate cherry bajo invernadero. Revista Chapingo. 12: 183-188.

Moreau, P., Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Laterrot, H. & Grimsley, N. 1998. Genetic mapping of Ph-2, a single locus controlling partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions Journal. 11: 259-269.

Nuninger, C., Steden, C. & Staud, T. 1995. The contribution of Metalaxyl-based fungicide mixtures to potato late blight control. pp. 122-129. En: Dowley, L., Bannon, E., Cooke, R. L., Keane, T. & O’sullivan, E. (eds.). Phytophthora infestans. Ediciones Boole Press Ltd., Dublin.

Pádua, J.G., Gusmão, S.A.L., Gsmã, M.T. & Braz, L.T. 2002. Efeito da densidade de plantio e da cobertura do solo na produção de duas cultivares de tomateiro tipo “cereja”. Horticultura Brasileira. 20 (2): 386-387.

Pakeerathan K., Mikunthan, G., Tharsani, N. 2009. Effect of different animal manures on Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) on tomato kandiah Pakeerathan. IDOSI Publications, Dubai.

Roldi, M. et al. 2013. Use of organic amendments to control meloidogyne incognita on tomatoes. Nematropica. 43 (1): 49-55.

Rumbos, C.I., Khahm, E.M. & Sabir, N. 2011. Response of local and commercial tomato cultivars and rootstocks to Meloidogyne javanica infestation. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5 (11): 1388-1395.

Salazar, W. & Guzmán, H.T. 2013. Efecto de poblaciones de Meloidogyne sp. en el desarrollo y rendimiento del tomate. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 24 (2): 419-426.

Tamayo, M.P.J. & Jaramillo, N.E. 2006. Enfermedades del tomate, pimentón, ají y berenjena en Colombia. Guía para su diagnóstico y manejo. Manual Técnico CORPOICA, Centro de Investigación la Selva. CORPOICA, Bogotá.

Testa, R., Trapani, A., Sgroi, F. & Tudisca, S. 2014. Economic sustainability of italian greenhouse cherry tomato. Sustainability. 6: 7967-7981.

Tian, Y. et al. 2015. Population Structure of the Late Blight Pathogen Phytophthora infestans in a Potato Germplasm Nursery in Two Consecutive Years. Phytopathology. 105 (6): 771-777.

Uresti, R.M.A. et al. 2007. Cultivo de tomate cereza en sistema hidropónico. Revista Digital Universitaria. 2 (3): 1-2.

Vallejo, C.F.A. 1999. Mejoramiento genético y producción de tomate en Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Palmira, Palmira.

Vega-Sánchez, M.E. et al. 2000. Host adaptation to potato and tomato within the US-1 clonal lineage of Phytophthora infestans in Uganda and Kenya. Plant Pathology. 49: 531-539.

Yaghoobi, J., Kaloshian, I., Wen, Y. & Williamson, V.M. 1995. Mapping a new nematode resistance locus in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 91: 457- 464.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |